SouperMeister
11-15-2007, 01:21 PM
8-1 or 7-2. As for Jansen, he's MUCH better than Wade. He played a great game on an ailing calf against Julius Peppers last year. The one guy who seems to own him the last few years is Strahan, but there's a long list of RT's that Strahan has dominated.
LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U
11-15-2007, 01:22 PM
No he's not the same, but he's still a quality RT.
I'll admit I was wrong on Wade. I thought he would fill in for Jansen and we wouldn't miss a beat. From what I've seen of Wade so far I've concluded Jansen is clearly the better player. Sorry Jon, I was wrong to doubt you!
What is the update on Stephon Heyer and his injury? I felt he did a lot better than Wade myself.
Heyer is still too much of a liability if you ask me. When he's in the game a TE almost always has to stay in and help.
LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U
11-15-2007, 01:32 PM
Heyer is still too much of a liability if you ask me. When he's in the game a TE almost always has to stay in and help.
I was sold on his performance against Jason Taylor week 1 to be just thrown in the fire and have to perform was great for him and our team
over the mountain
11-15-2007, 01:51 PM
when i think of all our injuries (which i try not to do) i dont think about what our record could have been but how it is going to effect our ability to finish strong in the second half of the season.
to answer your question; 6-3 i guess, who knows
LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U
11-15-2007, 01:58 PM
when i think of all our injuries (which i try not to do) i dont think about what our record could have been but how it is going to effect our ability to finish strong in the second half of the season.
to answer your question; 6-3 i guess, who knows
We should won every games we lose but the NE game with our injuries. Green Bay game lost by 3, Giants game lost by 7 could've tied the game up, Eagles dropped the game in the 4th quarter. I'm pretty puzzled why folks thinking we would only be 6-3 healthy?
BleedBurgundy
11-15-2007, 02:36 PM
I think it's because personnel wasn't the only factor in losing those games. So changing one variable isn't necessarily enough to change the outcome of the contest.
over the mountain
11-15-2007, 02:49 PM
when i think of injuries and how theyve effected us i guess im not considering the short-term miss a game or two injuries that has kept smoot, rabach, daniels, griffin, ST, marcus, moss and others out (they happen to every team) but the major ones like jansen, thomas and rogers.
the loss of jansen and thomas is a serious loss nodoubt but bugel has done a good job of pluggin in other guys to keep campbell relatively upright and the last few weeks theyve done a pretty good job of opening up running lanes.
plus we beat the winless 'phins in overtime when we were relatively healthy. i dont know man, its hard to gauge the effect injuries have had on us but they have definetly effected us. if ST was in there in the 4th quarter against the eagles perhaps he could have stopped westbrook on the long screen pass for the TD but he wasnt and he didnt.
go skins!
WaldSkins
11-15-2007, 03:36 PM
we should be 8-1 with the injuries.... we had all those games except the new england game won at the half.