The main reason the Skins lost to the Eagles?

I think you lost me at "Hi". Are you a math major ?It's OK to concede a point. You don't have to act like you are lost.

The defense has bailed out the offense on many other occasions this year, but they lost us the game yesterday.

The offense doesn't owe the defense anything. You can't make that argument.

Let me try that - the probability of the team that scores with the majority of the total points at the completion of one regulation game will be 100%.

Unless you can form a reasonable argument, with something to support it, I'm done arguing. I've made my point, and you refuse to bring an intelligent argument. You haven't attacked ANY of the points I've made in my posts. You just ignore them, and keep repeating, "score more points, blah, blah, blah." That's totally worthless.

It's OK to concede a point. You don't have to act like you are lost.

The defense has bailed out the offense on many other occasions this year, but they lost us the game yesterday.

The offense doesn't owe the defense anything. You can't make that argument.

"Act like" - did you follow or even try to follow his logic? No matter how good it was, it just wasn't presented well. And that's being nice.

The offense did enough yesterday to come away with the W.

Sorry, but the D blew it with countless DUMB penalties and a couple of back breaking big plays.

"Act like" - did you follow or even try to follow his logic? No matter how good it was, it just wasn't presented well. And that's being nice.

GTripp is the stats master. I'm pretty sure he understands what I was getting at.

Unless you can form a reasonable argument, with something to support it, I'm done arguing. I've made my point, and you refuse to bring an intelligent argument. You haven't attacked ANY of the points I've made in my posts. You just ignore them, and keep repeating, "score more points, blah, blah, blah." That's totally worthless.

Just because you use stats and all that doesn't necessarily mean that your argument is intelligent.

"Act like" - did you follow or even try to follow his logic? No matter how good it was, it just wasn't presented well. And that's being nice.I thought it was incredibly straightforward and well presented.

Now I just realize that it's not really a difference of opinion, but it's just a chasm between your position and reality.

We're you one of the people who put everything on Brunell last year despite the 32nd ranked defense? If so, what does this defensive unit have to do to warrant criticism? Does London Fletcher have to commit armed robbery? They just didn't get the job done, or even close to done yesterday.

GTripp is the stats master. I'm pretty sure he understands what I was getting at.Yep. Pretty much.

I'm sure you could have dug a lot deeper if you had wanted to, but the case you made seemed pretty solid to me as it was.

Simma down now. I see this thread headed down the wrong path.

Simma down now. I see this thread headed down the wrong path.I doubt it. Warriorzpath doesn't seem like the kind of guy who will attack people who disagree with him. I think he's dead wrong, but he's made his case civilly.