GhettoDogAllStars
11-09-2007, 04:36 PM
Its being discussed because after 3.5 years we are nowhere close to being a dominant team.
I'm not going to read this thread, but I did read the first page. I don't really want to participate, but I will say this: 3.5 years is all the time necessary to be a "dominant" team? Lower your expectations, and wake up to reality. It takes a decade or more to make a dominant team. Look at NE, IND, and PIT.
The PRIMARY reason we are not dominant is the impatience in our organization and fan-base, IMO.
I'm not going to read this thread, but I did read the first page. I don't really want to participate, but I will say this: 3.5 years is all the time necessary to be a "dominant" team? Lower your expectations, and wake up to reality. It takes a decade or more to make a dominant team. Look at NE, IND, and PIT.
The PRIMARY reason we are not dominant is the impatience in our organization and fan-base, IMO.