Should We or Could We Draft Steve Slaton from West Virginia

Sometimes, you get pounced on for actually introducing an intelligent idea. you've got to be on the bandwagon around here and not try to steer in different directions. It just can't be handled. Remember how bad Laron Landry supporters got dogged pre-draft last year? Just look at it as the more backlash, the better the idea.

That's ridiculous. We're not some sort of gestapo limiting free thought. Why we're even discussing the draft now I don't know. But we are so whatever. All I asked was if the thread wasn't about only Steve Slaton, why mention only Steve Slaton in the thread title?

Sometimes, you get pounced on for actually introducing an intelligent idea. you've got to be on the bandwagon around here and not try to steer in different directions. It just can't be handled. Remember how bad Laron Landry supporters got dogged pre-draft last year? Just look at it as the more backlash, the better the idea.

That's garbage dude. If you really think that's the case you can just take a hike.

Every draft thread has turned into an argument. So guys no more draft threads until February.

A question was asked of the original post, and it was answered. Why is it that when someone get questioned, panties automatically get bunched? It's not being nit-picky, it's being more precise. I'm all for original thought, because there isn't enough around here. However, that includes being able to question it as well...

What if I had broke out some Dr. Seuss...because that's what I first thought when I saw Should We or Could We. Would they, could they, in a class. Would they, could they, in the...well, I'll stop right there...

billyharless - I'll admit, I did not see the mention of a top rated RB in the original question...For that I apologize. However, doesn't it make sense to leave specifics out of a thread title, and leave them for the post? That's all I was trying to say.

thejbexperience - I for one am on no bandwagon, especially with these Kool-aid drinkin' MFers. More times than not, I totally disagree with the norm. However, if we can't question the original post, then why are we here? The whole idea of the board is to be able to question each other. And if you see this as one big clusterf*ck, with the mods at the helm, I suggest checking out other boards. I stopped going to other sites because this one actually gave a damn about other ideas and thoughts, not just the canned responses.

[/rant]

Sometimes, you get pounced on for actually introducing an intelligent idea. you've got to be on the bandwagon around here and not try to steer in different directions. It just can't be handled. Remember how bad Laron Landry supporters got dogged pre-draft last year? Just look at it as the more backlash, the better the idea.

I'm not sure what bandwagon you are referring to. There is usually a big divide between two or more camps on any given issue (see, for example, the "Belichick is Classless" and "Portis v. Betts" threads). People often incorrectly assume that because us mods, as Kool-Aid drinkers, agree on most issues. The fact is that we usually disagree on any given issue. I can't tell you how many times I've differed with Smootsmack, MattyK, Brud, et al.

This would be a really boring site if we all agreed or the mods imposed some "agree with us or be gone" policy. But, we encourage people to express different ideas. Anyone who has been around this site for a while should know that we don't order people to tow the company line. But, if your idea is different AND stupid, be prepared to get blasted for being stupid, not different.

Yeah, it's cool. I was being overly dramatic. I just didn't think the blasting was necessary in this case. It's not like he suggested we bring back Patrick Ramsey.

i dont remember what we gave up for Kendall. but we need to draft o-line man, defensive ends, a kicker late in the draft.

i dont remember what we gave up for Kendall. but we need to draft o-line man, defensive ends, a kicker late in the draft.

I think it was our 5th rounder.

I think we are kidding ourselves to some degree here...Portis is still a good back, but he is no longer elite (if he were elite- he'd average more than 3.5ish a carry). Are we really going to argue that Portis is great when his requirements to produce are 2-3 pro-bowlers on the o-line along with 2 other very high quality guys? Hmm, shouldn't any RB be able to succeed under those circumstances? Wouldn't you think that an elite back makes a bad line average (4 yards a carry), and a good line great (4.5-5 yards per carry)? I'm not saying that portis needs to go or anything like that, but I am saying lets be realistic here...he's not GREAT and hasn't been since 2005- not unlike Santana Moss.
that said, keep portis and betts, draft O and D line...
I hear what your saying, and I understand you point. I just feel, when it comes to drafting a player... we need to draft on need. We don't need a Reggie Bush situation here.

Because running backs get this superstar attention, everyone talks them up. I think running back is probably the most replaceable position in football. Look at what Denver does every year. I'm not saying there aren't exceptions to this, because there are some genuinely freakish running backs to have played the game (Barry Sanders). I don't think Clinton Portis is one of them, but I think he's an incredible running back. He blocks, he runs, he catches, he has heart. I wouldn't even consider Slayton an upgrade, at all.

Bottom line, if I'm drafting to win, with this team you have to draft on the offensive line. You absolutely have to. We will not win games, ever, without a solid line. So yes, I think this thread is retarded, because I don't think there has been much logic or thought put into it. It just doesn't make sense on any level (except in imagination land) to draft a running back.

With the O line aging and getting totally decimated draft 2 O linemen in the first 4 rounds along with a D linemen and a CB. I would seriously look to trade Moss for a pick. It is too late to get anything for Lloyd, we will just have to cut his ass. We also might h ave to use a high draft pick for a QB just for depth. Once Gibbs is gone I do not think JC is going to be the starter if he doesn't start playing smarter ball. I am beginning to agree with the JC naysayers now that he was so good at Auburn since he had two all pro type RBs carrying the load for him. That sucks to say that since I was all for starting JC last season from the onset last year, but I don't think JC is all that we want to make him out to be.