Are we 4-2 because of Gibbs, or in spite of him?

Pages : 1 2 3 [4]

irish
10-24-2007, 01:18 PM
For those of you who want Gibbs to let Saunders have complete autonomy in the offensive gameplanning, do you remember when he first came here and they were running about thirty reverses a game? Gibbs is the overwhelming yin to Saunder's yang.

Yes, I said yang, not wang.

IMO, Gibbs help AS and GW keep from killing each other. I think if Gibbs ever stepped down then either GW or AS would go because I just dont think they could work together. Gibbs is the buffer

bertoskins2
10-24-2007, 03:44 PM
gibbs is building something here, a future dynasty, it might not work for now but in the future it will. he is teaching dan synder his staffing secrets. we don't know but this will be a team to reckon with in the future.

WaldSkins
10-24-2007, 04:32 PM
We are 4-2 because of gibbs, but we also have two losses because of gibbs. We should still be undefeated..

Rajmahal33
10-24-2007, 05:39 PM
I think the question is moot. What does it matter if it is because of Gibbs or in spite of Gibbs that we are 4-2. The real question is how are we going to do for the rest of the season? We are facing adversity and I want to know how we will react.

We are 4-2, there are no excuses and there is no need to speculate, we are our record. We have 10 games left. When the season is over u can ask the same question and it may be more appropriate, b/c thats the time for retrospective analysis.

DynamiteRave
10-24-2007, 05:48 PM
No doubt, we're here because of him.

Think of where we'd be if we still had Spurrier...

*Shudders at the thought*

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum