|
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
[ 10]
11
12
13
14
sandtrapjack 10-23-2007, 04:03 PM I'm sorry, but Welker and Stallworth don't demand being doubled, at least not with our secondary. Maybe some other secondaries in the NFL, but not this one. Yes, they demand attention, just as Watson does. This will be a tough test, no doubt. But, I think the Skins will surprise some people this week. Even if they don't win the game, I think you will see them give the Pats the best game yet this year.
If this game were at FedEx, I might be inclined to agree. But the Skins have not proven to be an offensive juggernaut especially on the road.
The defense will have to play lights out for 4 solid quarters, and score on some defensive turnovers to have a chance.
We all know that most officials have a tendancy to get free with the little yellow flag where ST is concerned, be it deserved or not, referees so tend to pick on Taylor. Pats will not be scared to go his way because of this.
If any defense can hold the Pats under 30 it is the Skins. But this is an interconference matchup, and really does not bear huge consequence to New England. It is the Colts game, the following week that will have playoff implications even this early since they are both AFC teams.
Pats will try and put Washington away early and put Brady and company on the bench in the 4th quarter. Watch and see.
TheMalcolmConnection 10-23-2007, 04:04 PM Yeah, the Welker thing is killing me too. This is a guy who's taken advantage of teams having to double up on Moss. Don't get me wrong, he's good, but let's not get carried away either. Ditto Stallworth.
He has two good games in a row and all of a sudden he's the best slot receiver in football? Gimme' a break.
Now, I'm not saying he isn't talented and he won't score a TD against us, but honestly, we've covered better receivers before already this season.
TheMalcolmConnection 10-23-2007, 04:06 PM We all know that most officials have a tendancy to get free with the little yellow flag where ST is concerned, be it deserved or not, referees so tend to pick on Taylor. Pats will not be scared to go his way because of this.
I don't know if I would agree with that this year. Any time he's been challenged it's been either defended OR picked off. I don't even know if Brady is going to make it work.
Chief X_Phackter 10-23-2007, 04:55 PM If this game were at FedEx, I might be inclined to agree. But the Skins have not proven to be an offensive juggernaut especially on the road.
The defense will have to play lights out for 4 solid quarters, and score on some defensive turnovers to have a chance.
We all know that most officials have a tendancy to get free with the little yellow flag where ST is concerned, be it deserved or not, referees so tend to pick on Taylor. Pats will not be scared to go his way because of this.
If any defense can hold the Pats under 30 it is the Skins. But this is an interconference matchup, and really does not bear huge consequence to New England. It is the Colts game, the following week that will have playoff implications even this early since they are both AFC teams.
Pats will try and put Washington away early and put Brady and company on the bench in the 4th quarter. Watch and see.
Perhaps Brady and company will be on the bench in the 4th quarter, but I doubt it will be because they have an insurmountable lead...
I also believe that if they look past Washington to Indy, they will have to beat Indy in order to stay even with them.
#56fanatic 10-23-2007, 05:25 PM so what your saying is the skins are going to rush 4 and play zone with the lb's. I can see welker having a 16 catch game if this happens. You might start out like that , but will change quickly having to bring up a safety to help in the slot leaving moss or stallworth one on one on the outside, plus the fact if you only rush 4-5 brady will have time to make sandwiches back there
you know.. i sense a bit of arrogance. Look a ton of Skins fans out here have complimented your team and coach. saying how good you are and how you will probably win. You seem not to want to face the fact that our D is the strongest you have played and seem to believe our scheme is not working. If you have not noticed #1 in the NFC #3 in the NFL. We have played 2 or 3 of the top offenses in the league and have basically shut them down. I think you should show the same respect on the REDSKINS board as many of us here have show the Pats.
#56fanatic 10-23-2007, 05:28 PM The Patriots are averaging 40 points per game. The Redskins are averging 20 points per game against much worse defenses than that of the Patriots. New England has a top 5 defense and they are playing at home. Barring Brady, Moss and Welker catching the 24 hour clap, or, the stadium falling down, I'd say 34-13 Patriots is more accurate.
just because the pats whipped your ass doesn't automatically give them a win. Granted, I do believe the pats will win, but stop sounding like because they beat you like a rented mule makes them automatic super bowl winners
skinsfan69 10-23-2007, 05:31 PM Don't look now Mr.Wizard, but they are ranked slightly HIGHER than Washington in total defense.
Patriots are #4 in overall defense, Redskins #5
Patriots are #4 vs the pass, Redskins #8
Patriots are #9 vs the run, Redskins #5.
The only way to beat the Patriots is to generate a ton of turnovers.
The other way to beat them is with a bat while they are sleeping.
I don't care about yardage. The only stat that matters is scoring defense. I know we have a better scoring defense than the Pats.
skinsfan69 10-23-2007, 05:34 PM But do you see Dallas or New England hanging 48 on us.
Dallas no. But NE? I don't know. If the offense keeps going three and out then yes, I could see them dropping a lot points on us.
One thing about NE is they don't play to loose if they have a lead. They try and score instead of milking the clock.
GTripp0012 10-23-2007, 05:34 PM If this game were at FedEx, I might be inclined to agree. But the Skins have not proven to be an offensive juggernaut especially on the road.
The defense will have to play lights out for 4 solid quarters, and score on some defensive turnovers to have a chance.
We all know that most officials have a tendancy to get free with the little yellow flag where ST is concerned, be it deserved or not, referees so tend to pick on Taylor. Pats will not be scared to go his way because of this.
If any defense can hold the Pats under 30 it is the Skins. But this is an interconference matchup, and really does not bear huge consequence to New England. It is the Colts game, the following week that will have playoff implications even this early since they are both AFC teams.
Pats will try and put Washington away early and put Brady and company on the bench in the 4th quarter. Watch and see.The two games the Redskins have played on the road this year have actually turned out to be pretty effiecient offensive days. The Green Bay game was marred by fumbles and dropped passes, something the Redskin players have traditionally been good at preventing. But the offense had no problem carving up the defense in either situation.
Not a whole bunch of points scored in either of those games, but no reason to think the team can't score three TD's on NE.
Our worst offensive game was against Miami by far, only 13 points in regulation because we shortened the game with running plays.
I DON'T think the Pats are going to try to win this game early. That's not really their style. They didn't score early against Buffalo, they didn't score early against Cleveland, and even against you guys, they didn't explode until the 2nd half. Wasn't Dallas ahead in the 3rd quarter?
Brady will struggle if he tries to jump ahead early. The best way to attack the Redskins defense is to be patient, and eventually these guys will start missing tackles. I think that's how NE comes out, and it will be on the defense to tackle the ball, and on the offense to control the ball and score. FG's are alright against NE, we just need something. Our kicker only has 10 attempts on the year.
GTripp0012 10-23-2007, 05:36 PM Again, those jump balls to Moss took advantage of the fact that Cameron Worrell really isn't a football player. That was them exposing a matchup that simply isn't there against the Redskins.
|