dmek25
10-22-2007, 03:08 PM
i cant speak for everyone, but ill take 10 more of these ugly wins. i really could care less about what it looks like, as long as the skins end up in the playoffs
Why all the complaining?dmek25 10-22-2007, 03:08 PM i cant speak for everyone, but ill take 10 more of these ugly wins. i really could care less about what it looks like, as long as the skins end up in the playoffs MTK 10-22-2007, 03:10 PM i cant speak for everyone, but ill take 10 more of these ugly wins. i really could care less about what it looks like, as long as the skins end up in the playoffs Yep, as Parcells says you are what your record says you are. Simple but true. JWsleep 10-22-2007, 03:23 PM Look at it this way. An offense is a machine. Lots of moving parts working together for a common goal. One part starts malfunctioning and the rest of the parts probably hide it in most cases. Another and maybe some issues start showing up. If the wrong part breaks then the problems become obvious. The OLine is the engine of this machine. When it starts breaking down it doesn't matter how good anyone else is because you simply can't operate with every play breaking down in a rushed jailhouse break. Our OLine is broken right now. If you want to attack depth I can that argument way more but don't attack the philosophy because we are cornered. Yup. My sentiments exactly. Good posts throughout, FRPLG. And still, I think we're not that far off, if Rabach gets healthy. We need to pick up 3rd downs, obviously--but we're getting to 3rd and short a lot, and that's a good sign. A second more to throw (that's actually a lot!) or a 1 yard more push from the line, and we get a fresh set of downs. The next play is often the best for playaction--the D is stacked against the run (Gibbs loves to run, etc. etc.), you get good matchups for Cooley or the backs out of the backfield, and you at times get single coverage on the WRs. WE NEVER GOT INTO THAT SITUATION YESTERDAY. A few first downs on those 3rd and shorts, and the playbook opens up. We failed to convert--injuries, execution, and playcalling failed us there. But we're not that far off, IMO. And we have a great D. And WE WON ANYWAY! firstdown 10-22-2007, 03:52 PM I'm not sure what everyone wants with half of the O line out and a new QB a win is a win. The Zimmermans 10-22-2007, 04:03 PM people want the redskins to play to their potential. Campbell is a better QB than warner right now 12thMan 10-22-2007, 04:06 PM I'm probably in the minority here, but for some reason I think we'd still have most of the same offensive problems even if our offensive line was completely healthy. Portis isn't hitting on all cylinders, Betts hasn't really picked up the slack the way he did last season, and Moss is in a funk. Overall, there just doesn't seem to be much intensity with the players, chemistry between teammates, and general disorganization with coaching. And no, I never expected us to be on the level of the Patriots. You actually nailed it, Beemnseven. This whole thing about the offensive line being banged, while true, I really don't think we'd see much different to be honest. That being said, I think the Pats are going to face their toughest oppenent yet, and I can't wait for the Skins to come home 5-2!! TheBigD 10-22-2007, 04:25 PM I'm probably in the minority here, but for some reason I think we'd still have most of the same offensive problems even if our offensive line was completely healthy. Portis isn't hitting on all cylinders, Betts hasn't really picked up the slack the way he did last season, and Moss is in a funk. Overall, there just doesn't seem to be much intensity with the players, chemistry between teammates, and general disorganization with coaching. And no, I never expected us to be on the level of the Patriots. You are correct, sir. In my way to work, I was listenning to Doc Walker on SportsTalk 980. He was saying how sick he is of the team using the O-line as an excuse for being sloppy. Yes, the line is not what they envisioned it to be in the preseason, but you can't just simply give up. I mean the Titans and Panthers won with back-up QBs. Good teams don't just throw in the towel because players get hurt. Southpaw 10-22-2007, 04:44 PM Good teams don't just throw in the towel because players get hurt. Who threw in the towel? They effing won. And if Doc Walker thinks that having 60% of your starting linemen injured is not a legitimate reason for a hindered offensive gameplan, he has no business analyzing football. Of course O line injuries have no effect on dropped balls and fumbles, but it has a major impact on pass protection and running lanes. AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace 10-22-2007, 04:54 PM You are correct, sir. In my way to work, I was listenning to Doc Walker on SportsTalk 980. He was saying how sick he is of the team using the O-line as an excuse for being sloppy. Yes, the line is not what they envisioned it to be in the preseason, but you can't just simply give up. I mean the Titans and Panthers won with back-up QBs. Good teams don't just throw in the towel because players get hurt. Isn't Pucillo a tight end most of the time...we didn't play so bad considering. Anyway....back to work, just wanted to get a post in this week...HAIL, and here's to the "any given sunday" factor against the patriots MTK 10-22-2007, 05:08 PM Who threw in the towel? They effing won. And if Doc Walker thinks that having 60% of your starting linemen injured is not a legitimate reason for a hindered offensive gameplan, he has no business analyzing football. Of course O line injuries have no effect on dropped balls and fumbles, but it has a major impact on pass protection and running lanes. LOL seriously, who the F has given up? 4-2 last time I checked. :doh: |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum