Vikings - Cowboys Thread

For everyone down on our team, Dallas played exactly the same as we did on Sunday, doing barely enough to beat an average team with a HORRIBLE qb.NO here is how it went:

Dallas dominated and barely won.

The Skins got dominated and barely won.

LOL.

LUCK? Come on, you could get lucking in one, two, three or even four plays, but not to come back against the so claimed top 5 defense in the NFL and do it with such ease. I don't know who said it, but the saying goes something like "I believe in luck, and the harder I work the more I have" it might've been TJ.

You say the Redskins weren't lucky, are you kidding? If the Cardinals didn't miss the PAT or Boldin throws it just a foot or two higher for the 2 point conversion, or Racker doesn't miss, you would be screaming how inept this offense is and rightly so.

The only thing I liked about the game is how Gibbs didn't do that BS timeout to make Racker redo it. It is about time coaches act like men and take defeat like men too.

I hope the NFL looks at that in the offseason. It's legal but it's definitely a shady move.

I would be absolutely livid to see a game winning kick go through only to have to kick it again because the coach called TO from the sidelines, and the re-kick sails wide.

NO here is how it went:

Dallas dominated and barely won.

The Skins got dominated and barely won.

What is so hard about admitting you did barely enough to win? Yes, you moved the ball with ease for much of the game... but the score was close at the end...

What is so hard about admitting you did barely enough to win? Yes, you moved the ball with ease for much of the game... but the score was close at the end...Dude, you even quoted what I said. Can't you read? I said "Dallas Dominated and BARELY won".

No, I can't. Thanks for pointing out my learning disability. I'm actually having this read to me right now...

You B-A-R-E-L-Y won that game. I watched it. Had the vikings been quarterbacked by a legit NFL qb, your defense was toast.

No, I can't. Thanks for pointing out my learning disability. I'm actually having this read to me right now...

You B-A-R-E-L-Y won that game. I watched it. Had the vikings been quarterbacked by a legit NFL qb, your defense was toast.
Seriously?? This is coming from someone whose team barely won against the Cardinals and got dominated in every aspect of the game. Let's see, other than the Lions' game, tell me which game the offense looked solid? Even the game Dallas lost they scored 27. The Skins offense could not put away and 0-6 team AT HOME and had to wait for their kicker to save them in OT.

I am not pointing out anything and I am not insulting anyone. But you quoted what I said. Isaid in my post that Dallas barely won, and you wanted me to "admit" to what I have already said.

I know you are frustrated, but instead of ranting about how barely Dallas won, you should be more concerned about how your team will do next weekend.

I am not talking about us, I can freely freaking admit that we barely won. I'm a realist. Focus on the issue at hand. The point of everything I said is that if you look around the league this week, including but not limited to the Dallas Fucking Cowboys, you will see that a lot of solid teams struggled with not so solid teams. If this offends your delicate sensibilities, too bad.

What the hell is the point of your posts? What are you arguing about? I'm saying we barely won, I'm just saying we shouldn't get too down about it since other good teams (hey, that's a friggin' compliment) i.e. the Cowboys also played poorly...

I am not talking about us, I can freely freaking admit that we barely won. I'm a realist. Focus on the issue at hand. The point of everything I said is that if you look around the league this week, including but not limited to the Dallas Fucking Cowboys, you will see that a lot of solid teams struggled with not so solid teams. If this offends your delicate sensibilities, too bad.

What the hell is the point of your posts? What are you arguing about? I'm saying we barely won, I'm just saying we shouldn't get too down about it since other good teams (hey, that's a friggin' compliment) i.e. the Cowboys also played poorly...
I am not offended, mad or even bothered by your comments. You are the one who responded to my post after I pointed out the differences. Both teams barely won, but Dallas looked good barely winning where as the Skins, well looked like the 2nd half Skins they have been this season.

Look at the yards gained and yards allowed for the Skins, Dallas and each of their respective opponents. Look at the margin of victory of the two games. How are those the same is just beyond me. Plus, the bright spot on the Skins team, before Sundays game, was the D. They didn't look good in the second half either.

Your sig suggests that we "Breath.think.Post"
Here is mine for you
Breath.Breath.Breath.Think.Post.

You are mad, and rightly so, but at the wrong person.

LOL.

LUCK? Come on, you could get lucking in one, two, three or even four plays, but not to come back against the so claimed top 5 defense in the NFL and do it with such ease. I don't know who said it, but the saying goes something like "I believe in luck, and the harder I work the more I have" it might've been TJ.

You say the Redskins weren't lucky, are you kidding? If the Cardinals didn't miss the PAT or Boldin throws it just a foot or two higher for the 2 point conversion, or Racker doesn't miss, you would be screaming how inept this offense is and rightly so.

The only thing I liked about the game is how Gibbs didn't do that BS timeout to make Racker redo it. It is about time coaches act like men and take defeat like men too.

That's just silly. If the Redskins hadn't missed that field goal in the 2nd half, Rackers' field goal attempt would not have meant anything. If the refs hadn't given the Cardinals two BS penalties on two 3rd downs in a TD drive, Rackers field goal attempt would not have meant a thing. If the Cardinals had not gotten a funky bounce on the onside kick, Rackers' field goal attempt would have meant nothing.

Ifs are stupid. All that matters is whether you got a "W" or a "L."

I am not offended, mad or even bothered by your comments. You are the one who responded to my post after I pointed out the differences. Both teams barely won, but Dallas looked good barely winning where as the Skins, well looked like the 2nd half Skins they have been this season.

Look at the yards gained and yards allowed for the Skins, Dallas and each of their respective opponents. Look at the margin of victory of the two games. How are those the same is just beyond me. Plus, the bright spot on the Skins team, before Sundays game, was the D. They didn't look good in the second half either.

Your sig suggests that we "Breath.think.Post"
Here is mine for you
Breath.Breath.Breath.Think.Post.

You are mad, and rightly so, but at the wrong person.


I responded because your posts were pointless. They were simply making excuses for why you're team was barely able to beat a weak opponent. I'm done with this conversation.