Are the redskins gearing up for 5 WR sets?

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7

wbecker999
10-02-2007, 12:21 PM
Maybe the reason we signed McCardell is to implement a five receiver set.
The spread offense is really working for the teams that use it from college to the pro’s.

MTK
10-02-2007, 12:23 PM
Probably not.

They signed him due to Moss being nicked up, and overall lack of depth behind Moss and ARE.

wbecker999
10-02-2007, 12:28 PM
Probably not.

They signed him due to Moss being nicked up, and overall lack of depth behind Moss and ARE.

Or is that what they want everyone to believe?

skins268
10-02-2007, 12:29 PM
Guess Brandon Lloyd really pissed somebody off,Again.Mccardell is a good WR but my god all we heard about BL was he was Great with SF and he made tons of plays,which he did,BUT come on put him in the game stretch the field,between Moss and Lloyd we would have a hell of a Deep threat tandem.Just passing time til 4:00 when I can go-

EARTHQUAKE2689
10-02-2007, 12:29 PM
No Matty pretty much hit it on the head. Reche Caldwell was signed cause Lloyd couldnt get on the field, and MCcardell was signed cause Moss isnt 100%.

skinsnut
10-02-2007, 12:32 PM
Thats insane....no chance at all.
What they should do is have a 2 back set with ARE, Moss and Cooley in all the time.

There are your 5 best ball handlers and it give you the option to run...
Why we haven't seen this is beyond me.

MTK
10-02-2007, 12:36 PM
Or is that what they want everyone to believe?

LOL we can't even send Cooley out in pass patterns right now due to the need to keep him in to help out with blocking and you think they are going to start running 5 wides?

firstdown
10-02-2007, 12:37 PM
Guess Brandon Lloyd really pissed somebody off,Again.Mccardell is a good WR but my god all we heard about BL was he was Great with SF and he made tons of plays,which he did,BUT come on put him in the game stretch the field,between Moss and Lloyd we would have a hell of a Deep threat tandem.Just passing time til 4:00 when I can go-
Not sure that his numbers were that great in SF and the think was that he had talent that SF was not using in him. I don't think we can say (fro sure) that he ticked someone off as much as he is just not showing the coaches anything in pratice.

wbecker999
10-02-2007, 12:59 PM
The spread offense really works well with New England.
It would be nice to see our offense move that way.

MTK
10-02-2007, 01:02 PM
New England isn't missing their entire right side along the offensive line and they also don't have a QB with 10 career starts.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum