|
DiehardSkin88 09-24-2007, 12:30 PM This game cleary showed who is the better back. Betts has had 1 good year, he had his first td as a redskin in 05, how many has portis had for us since 04..... Betts is not a good runner, puts his head down and will try and run over ppl without even looking his team or the other, dont matter
jdlea 09-24-2007, 12:31 PM This game cleary showed who is the better back. Betts has had 1 good year, he had his first td as a redskin in 05, how many has portis had for us since 04..... Betts is not a good runner, puts his head down and will try and run over ppl without even looking his team or the other, dont matter
I think saying he's not a good runner is a little much, but the guy shouldn't have been the one toting the rock on the goalline with the game on the line.
Chief X_Phackter 09-24-2007, 12:36 PM I think saying he's not a good runner is a little much, but the guy shouldn't have been the one toting the rock on the goalline with the game on the line.
True Dat!
BrunellMVP? 09-24-2007, 12:36 PM to be honest, yes, I'd rather have seen portis in, but I don't care who is back there...we should have scored. portis, betts or sellers...whatever...
skinsfan242 09-24-2007, 12:48 PM to be honest, yes, I'd rather have seen portis in, but I don't care who is back there...we should have scored. portis, betts or sellers...whatever...
Betts is good between the 20's. Last year we had a problem scoring inside the 5 because Betts was playing not Portis. Portis has scored all three times we were inside the 10 this year. Why he was not is beyond me.
Another point, why don't we use the naked bootleg? I've never seen that play stopped in my life! It was the perfect time they new were were going left and cheating that way.
BrunellMVP? 09-24-2007, 12:52 PM you know that sellers play worked really well in the past (the year he had like 6 TDs for a total of 8 yards), so i don't mind the call...
as for betts- i agree, should have been someone else, but really...i'm not sure it would have made a difference....the calls were bad..too transparent as the giants were in the backfield...
dgack 09-24-2007, 12:54 PM Another point, why don't we use the naked bootleg? I've never seen that play stopped in my life! It was the perfect time they new were were going left and cheating that way.
Amen. It's not like we've got gimpy, glass-crafted Brunell in there. J-Cam should *easily* score on that call, and he's shown that he can take a little contact with no ill effects.
EternalEnigma21 09-24-2007, 01:05 PM yeah I wouldve rather had portis searching for paydirt than betts... but in that situation on the one yardline I wouldve handed it to sellers or done a QB sneak...
skinsfan69 09-24-2007, 01:45 PM The bottom line is Portis fumbled and didn't catch a pass that would have helped keep a drive alive. Maybe we need to bring in Rock.
Southpaw 09-24-2007, 01:52 PM The bottom line is Portis fumbled and didn't catch a pass that would have helped keep a drive alive. Maybe we need to bring in Rock.
How the hell is that the bottom line, when Betts had the opportunity to tie up the game and failed twice? It sounds like your only defense of Betts lack of ability is that Portis had a bad play too. That's a ridiculous argument.
And as far as the Portis fumble; it was a bad exchange. Portis never even had possession of the ball. And the dropped pass is bad, but those plays happen. What's your defense for Betts' less than two yard rush average?
|