Skins are J. Clayton's #2 sleeper [Archive] - Commanders Post at The Warpath


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > Skins are J. Clayton's #2 sleeper PDA Skins are J. Clayton's #2 sleeper Pages : [1] 2 3 freddyg12 08-31-2007, 03:04 PM ESPN - Clayton: Five sleeper teams for 2007 season - NFL (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/preview07/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=2997877) I agree w/his first 2 teams. SmootSmack 08-31-2007, 03:06 PM Tampa Bay?!! Yeah I don't think so I think the Rams take the NFC West (of course I've said that three years in a row now) jsarno 08-31-2007, 03:12 PM Tampa Bay?!! Yeah I don't think so I think the Rams take the NFC West (of course I've said that three years in a row now) But you never asked me, and I feel the Rams will take it this year. :D I agree, the Skins are definitely a team to worry about. I don't agree with the Titans, they are not going to do better than the 8 wins they had last year. He makes a good argument about the Bucs...they only had 4 wins last year, so if they win 7, they are a sleeper team. 70Chip 08-31-2007, 03:15 PM Tampa Bay?!! Yeah I don't think so I think the Rams take the NFC West (of course I've said that three years in a row now) I understand why people fall in love with the Rams. But, if you can't stop the run you're going nowhere. Meks 08-31-2007, 03:17 PM bucs no, dolphins ehh not this year, rams a sleeper? .. i think they are a team with m ad potential, not a sleeper, titans i agree with as long as they found a replacment for pacman as a catalyst on D and S-T..... and yes of course, we a re a sleeper team to gosh darn worry about! jsarno 08-31-2007, 03:22 PM bucs no, dolphins ehh not this year, rams a sleeper? .. i think they are a team with m ad potential, not a sleeper, titans i agree with as long as they found a replacment for pacman as a catalyst on D and S-T..... and yes of course, we a re a sleeper team to gosh darn worry about! A sleeper should be defined as a team that will make a noticable improvement from last year...3 games in a good indicator. The Rams could win 10 or 11, thus a sleeper. No freakin way the Titans win 10 or 11, therefore they will be a bust. They will be lucky to win 7 which would be a DECREASE from last year. Warpath 08-31-2007, 03:23 PM How can STL be a sleeper team when every person I've heard on the radio has picked them to win the west? I'll take the 49ers with the Cards having serious potential. The Skins have a good chance to do great things this year, because I do not believe that they are a 5-11 team and they got a 5-11 teams schedule this year. This will help out. Skins should win no less than 9 games this year. We should go at least 4-2 in the nfc east at worst and Im pulling for 5-1. Coutndown to kickoff is here! jsarno 08-31-2007, 03:27 PM How can STL be a sleeper team when every person I've heard on the radio has picked them to win the west? I'll take the 49ers with the Cards having serious potential. The Skins have a good chance to do great things this year, because I do not believe that they are a 5-11 team and they got a 5-11 teams schedule this year. This will help out. Skins should win no less than 9 games this year. We should go at least 4-2 in the nfc east at worst and Im pulling for 5-1. Coutndown to kickoff is here! That's a very good post. Now that you mentioned it, I am surprised that the 49ers and Cards aren't on that list...although the cards are always a sexy sleeper pick. dall-assblows 08-31-2007, 03:46 PM i think dallass should be #1 on that list Warpath 08-31-2007, 03:48 PM i think dallass should be #1 on that list They aren't a sleeper either, they've been picked to win the East.