Keydrick Vincent

RMSkins
08-28-2007, 06:02 PM
Redskins Insider (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/)
JLC seems to think the Skins should go after recently released Ravens OL Keydrick Vincent. What do you guys think about this?

redskins21x
08-28-2007, 06:41 PM
Go after him for atleast a 2yr deal

GMScud
08-28-2007, 07:17 PM
7yr vet. 6-5 325, has started 48 games. I'm sure he could be had for a bargain. Why not? We need experienced healthy depth, and the guy wouldn't have to go far to get here.

skinsnut
08-28-2007, 10:17 PM
does anyone have a grade on him as a guard compared to who we have and dockery?

I think this could be a decent move but I worry about cap space and I am hoping we extend cooley and/or perhaps score a pass rushing end and a 6'3 posession receiver.

Right now, I'm thinking bpth a pass rush and a possession reciever are more important that another backup guard who doesn't know the playbook...
To me...the easiest position to quickly fit in would be a pass rush specialist.
I'd rank that our highest need followed by WR and Oline depth.

bigSkinsfan61
08-28-2007, 11:15 PM
sign him

MTK
08-28-2007, 11:23 PM
He's nothing overly special, good for depth though

2006 Scouting Report - Scouts Inc.
Grade: 65 | Key
Alert: M

Comment:
Vincent has a solid combination of size, athleticism and experience. He is tough and has good functional play strength. He is a short-area mauler who has enough quickness to position, wall off and create inside lanes. He is quick off the snap and can get into defenders, steer and generate a push. He has a good initial surge when he maintains his pad level. He flashes the ability to pull short. In pass protection, he can slide, bend, move his feet and stay square off short sets. But Vincent lacks consistency and ideal agility. He can struggle to stay under control on second-level combination patterns. His pass-blocking technique needs work. He bends at the waist, gets top-heavy and doesn't recover well. He isn't very explosive with his arms and hands. He lacks ideal awareness and tends to play with tunnel vision. He struggles against quickness and doesn't always maintain pocket depth against power rushers. He lacks position versatility and ended 2005 on injured reserve (thigh).

davy
08-29-2007, 03:12 PM
He must have played alongside Rabach?

That alone would make him very interesting.

Pocket$ $traight
08-30-2007, 12:02 AM
This would be a great move. He can play both guard positions and the fact that he played with Rabach is icing on the cake. This signing would take away any questions about our line (minus Jansen going downhill like Clark Griswald) for at least a couple years.

skinsnut
08-30-2007, 11:09 AM
He's nothing overly special, good for depth though

2006 Scouting Report - Scouts Inc.
Grade: 65 | Key
Alert: M

Comment:
Vincent has a solid combination of size, athleticism and experience. He is tough and has good functional play strength. He is a short-area mauler who has enough quickness to position, wall off and create inside lanes. He is quick off the snap and can get into defenders, steer and generate a push. He has a good initial surge when he maintains his pad level. He flashes the ability to pull short. In pass protection, he can slide, bend, move his feet and stay square off short sets. But Vincent lacks consistency and ideal agility. He can struggle to stay under control on second-level combination patterns. His pass-blocking technique needs work. He bends at the waist, gets top-heavy and doesn't recover well. He isn't very explosive with his arms and hands. He lacks ideal awareness and tends to play with tunnel vision. He struggles against quickness and doesn't always maintain pocket depth against power rushers. He lacks position versatility and ended 2005 on injured reserve (thigh).


Whats the grade for kendell and dockery?

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum