Is todd wade really gonna start at LG?

Pages : 1 2 [3] 4

SmootSmack
08-22-2007, 09:46 AM
I think you are right dead on with this. Getting Kendell would be a much needed piece to our current puzzle. With him on the roster we could put him in at left guard and consider using T. Wade at RT for Jansen if he does not improve. I do recall when he was in there doing "cough" as good or better job than Jansen. Than we can develop Heyer through this season and he would still be a decent back up if needed.

Jets problem with Kendell seems there want him to play Center which he has alot of problems with but he seems to be a great guard.

But isn't Kendall four years older than anyone we currently have on our already "old" Offensive Line? I don't want want to give up anything (i.e. a player or a pick) for a stopgap measure like Kendall. Unless we think he has several years left in him a la Ray Brown

jermus22
08-22-2007, 03:32 PM
Boo hoo. Take the freaking time to put some grammar effort into your posts please. Some of them are rather illegible.

My grammar is more better than you alls grammar.

firstdown
08-22-2007, 04:02 PM
I'm not the very good with grammer but if after you type the thread read it again and that will help. Its one thing to post something thats a little rough to read but starting a thread which is hard to read is another story. Just remember that if your interested in a topic enough to start a tread try and word it so others will be interested in the thread and if its hard to read or follow people will just skip to another thread. Which you will have probably started!LOL

SmootSmack
08-22-2007, 04:25 PM
Amziangly stdiues show taht if you jsut hvae the frsit and lsat lteters spleld crorctley in ecah wrod, poelpe will sitll unerstnad waht you are tyrnig to say. Hwoveer we sitll inisst on legible posts hree on tihs site

(more legible than what I just wrote)

skinsfan69
08-22-2007, 04:39 PM
I think you are right dead on with this. Getting Kendell would be a much needed piece to our current puzzle. With him on the roster we could put him in at left guard and consider using T. Wade at RT for Jansen if he does not improve. I do recall when he was in there doing "cough" as good or better job than Jansen. Than we can develop Heyer through this season and he would still be a decent back up if needed.

Jets problem with Kendell seems there want him to play Center which he has alot of problems with but he seems to be a great guard.

It would be a good move but it's not going to happen. He is under contract and the reason he isn't happy is because he wants more $. Plus he is in his mid 30's.

DGreene28
08-22-2007, 04:44 PM
But isn't Kendall four years older than anyone we currently have on our already "old" Offensive Line? I don't want want to give up anything (i.e. a player or a pick) for a stopgap measure like Kendall. Unless we think he has several years left in him a la Ray Brown

After watching Kendall closely in the Jets last preseason game vs the Cowgirls last week, we can safely say he still has what it takes to be one of the better guards in this league. If I was a betting man he has 2-3 years left in the tank. If we could get him for a 5th round pick (which the what the Jets were looking for a while back) I would jump at the chance. Alas it looks like Kendall is in the Jets plans this year no matter what he says about the FO... so we should look elsewhere

firstdown
08-22-2007, 04:51 PM
Amziangly stdiues show taht if you jsut hvae the frsit and lsat lteters spleld crorctley in ecah wrod, poelpe will sitll unerstnad waht you are tyrnig to say. Hwoveer we sitll inisst on legible posts hree on tihs site

(more legible than what I just wrote)
I read that like everything was spelled correct. I spell so bad that when I use spell check it throws up a ? mark. The sad part is my mother is an english/ grammer teacher with only a few hour from her Dr. degree. I never email her because she will correct everthing and sen it back the way it should have been done.

sandman89
08-22-2007, 06:57 PM
O great now if the LG position is a worry than most likely well draft a LG if nothings wrong.

SmootSmack
08-22-2007, 07:25 PM
O great now if the LG position is a worry than most likely well draft a LG if nothings wrong.

:confused:

dmek25
08-22-2007, 07:29 PM
enough of butchering our beautiful language. not to rip you, but take the time to do it write( pun intended:))

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum