Redskins Insider: What we learned

Pages : [1] 2

MTK
08-20-2007, 05:50 PM
What We Learned (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/)

Overall, the first team offense did what all of you guys were hoping it would. Whole lot to like about that game if you're a Skins fan. But let's start with the only thing everyone will ever remember about that game - the sight of Jason Campbell's plant foot getting buckled by a direct blow to the outside of the knee.


O-Line Issues. I have railed against the Stephon Heyer/Left Side Of The Line experiment pretty much since the onset. Now you know why. That was the season right there Saturday night, folks, and had Campbell blown out his knee after that D End blew through the kid tackle, well, not many football people would have been surprised. It was an accident waiting to happen, and I don't want to hear anything this year about the Skins not getting any breaks, because they already got the biggest break possible in August.


Even so, losing Campbell for even a week is a big deal. The third preseason game is the week that's a dress rehearsal for the regular season, with the most game planning and an approach similar to what goes on when the games count. Every practice is precious for Jason, and thus for the Redskins for that matter, and who knows how long he will have some discomfort. It was imperative to get Campbell's footwork and movement precise, and now he may have to compensate a bit. It's a setback for sure - albeit it much, much smaller than what nearly happened - and they came a fraction of an inch from taking a year or more off the kid's career and having all of his progress and hard work this offseason go down the drain.
If they go with Heyer at left tackle against Terrell Suggs this Saturday they are courting disaster again.


Hey, they have no depth on the O Line and few options - trust me I get that, even though it's a problem of their own creation (that's what the middle rounds of the draft are for) - but this has to stop. Like I wrote a week ago, too many people not named Bugel and Gibbs have told me this is an accident in waiting. Too many personnel people have told me the un-drafted kid just isn't ready to be protecting the blindside of the young franchise quarterback right now and that as his number of snaps in this role increases, despite him being serviceable for a series or two, that one huge error is always lurking.

"Right now, he can't play," one exec said. "I don't care what the Redskins tell you, he is not an NFL left tackle right now."

MTK
08-20-2007, 05:51 PM
I've gotta say this is one of those rare times I disagree with JLC. He really seems to be overreacting in my opinion.

70Chip
08-20-2007, 06:03 PM
These writers always get into a twist when they talk to execs from other teams. It's like they can't believe the Redskins would be putting a gloss on things. "I can't believe Coach Bugel would lie to me, I'm the Insider!"

Gmanc711
08-20-2007, 06:07 PM
It maybe a slight over-reaction...but we have some serious problems at that left gaurd position. I hope we can pick someone up off the waiver wire and hope that we can add some serious depth at that left gaurd spot.

dmek25
08-20-2007, 06:13 PM
good read. and does anyone here really believe he is ready to start? i highly doubt it

DirteePosse
08-20-2007, 06:18 PM
Heyer is a good player, but he's not ready to start. I do see the potential in him, playing behind Samuels he'll learn a lot.

holcknowsbest
08-20-2007, 06:25 PM
I've gotta say this is one of those rare times I disagree with JLC. He really seems to be overreacting in my opinion.

Aint that the truth...i personally have never trusted a word JLC says because i dont think his nuggets are anything but his opinions. he may get the answers he wants to hear only because he is the one asking the question. He doesnt get a good interview from anyone in that locker room so he resorts to talking to other teams "executives". remember when sellers called him a little wessel on washington post live, the guy's a nerd man. Plus, he is way off base here and Kiesel didnt run right over him, it was clear that he didnt know his job on that particular protection against that front. It was a mental not physical thing.

GridIron26
08-20-2007, 08:34 PM
good read. and does anyone here really believe he is ready to start? i highly doubt it

Entering the pre-season, nobody including Heyer himself expected to start the game.. It happens, and you are right.. He is not good enough to start BUT he is improving lot I can see it myself.. I believe we found a raw gem..

GMScud
08-20-2007, 08:34 PM
Look, Heyer got pushed around badly against Tennessee, and we almost lost our season because he got blown up vs. Pitt. He may be a good project, but bottom line, the guy was undrafted for a reason. I can understand wanting to get him reps in the preseason to groom him, but do it with the second team for God's sake. Starting an undrafted rookie with "lower body strength" issues to protect our season's blindside is a BAD idea. I see no reason why Fabini or another non-rookie couldn't start in Samuels place.

On the flip-side, if Heyer really is our 3rd best option at tackle, then we could be in big trouble.

Pocket$ $traight
08-20-2007, 09:26 PM
I think they should abandon the Wade LG experiment and let him watch the blindside then when the season starts let him challenge Jansen.

They should have had Jansen studying at guard this whole time.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum