12thMan
08-20-2007, 05:54 PM
But what exactly is 100%, no soreness? That knee is going to be a little tender by the time Saturday rolls around.
Would You Play Campbell vs Ravens?12thMan 08-20-2007, 05:54 PM But what exactly is 100%, no soreness? That knee is going to be a little tender by the time Saturday rolls around. Gtothearry 08-20-2007, 05:55 PM I say let him play for 3-4 series. However, make sure his backside is coveredddddddddddd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 70Chip 08-20-2007, 06:01 PM But what exactly is 100%, no soreness? That knee is going to be a little tender by the time Saturday rolls around. Yeah, and I would sit him in that situation. It's not that big of a deal. Why take a chance. Especially when the D-Coordinator of the opponent is called "Ryan". You know those guys wouldn't pass on a borderline hit. mlmpetert 08-20-2007, 06:48 PM Campbell is a MUST play this week if he is healthy. There is no risk of further injuring his knee. He NEEDS the reps. Even if its just a couple series. We don't need him trying to get comfortable still in week 2 on MNF @ Philly and week 3 against the Giants at FedEx. In my opinion, this is a risk that we MUST take (assuming he can cope with the soreness). We cannot afford to have a slow start this year. Exactly. He also needs to prove that hes not scared or favoring his knee and he needs to hold on to the ball when he gets hit. If he has any more fumbles this preseason then hes gonna get blitzed all day long come the regular season, he needs to over come this quick (what a better way then vs. bmore's D) bridaman51 08-20-2007, 06:57 PM I had to say no. The Ravens defense is a bunch of cheap shot thugs, look at them last night against the Giants. If our O line was completely healthy maybe but with heyer protecting that blind side I would not risk it. Sit him this week (practice but not play) and get him in for a few series next week and be ready for the regular season. Redskin 08-20-2007, 07:00 PM yes it will be valuable for cmpbell to learn some of the blitz that the ravens will throw at us, he needs to learn to recognize that better. saden1 08-20-2007, 07:02 PM If he can play full speed, yes, otherwise no. Gmanc711 08-20-2007, 07:06 PM If he is 100% yes, if not than absolutley not....and I would run an awful lot of plays that give the left side of the line some pass protection help... GhettoDogAllStars 08-21-2007, 01:12 AM He should play. I think they should treat this game like a regular season game, as usually the 3rd preseason game is. Just because our line is hurting is no excuse to bench him. It is quite possible our line will be unstable all year. Then what? He should play, and the offense should adjust to protect him better (i.e.: jumbo sets, play action, etc). KLHJ2 08-21-2007, 01:48 AM I am with CP on this one, preseason is for the birds; keep the starters healthy. Besides I have seen enough from Campbell to believe that he can get the job done. Playing him against the Ravens is not going to make the running game any better and that is what is hurting us the most. The lack of protection I blame mostly on our inability to run the football right now. Lets face it, the running game will not get any better until at least Portis, Betts and Samuels are healthy again. I understand that most teams use the 3rd preseason game to simulate a regular season game, but the starters played the entire first half in the first 2 games. IMO what they should do is dedicate the 1st half to the starting offensive line and running the football, that's it. All of the rest of the Starters should get the night off and use the remaining games to evaluate talent at the depth and special teams positions. I know that this is a much different approach and that I am not a head football coach, but why does everyone have to take the same 3rd game approach? Be unique and base it on what's best for your team, not the norm. Now feel free to bash my opinion because I know it's comming. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum