Luxorreb
08-20-2007, 05:16 AM
Is it possible that Priest becomes a Redskin by week 9 or next season when he's 34? Or sooner? Seems like Edwards doesn't wanna activate him for roster spots if he wasn't ready yet. Also Larry Johnson contract discussions. I say send Priest here!
mooby
08-20-2007, 05:21 AM
I think we're good at running back. Priest Holmes or not, we don't need a 34 year old running back that hasn't played in two years because of various injuries.
dmek25
08-20-2007, 07:33 AM
ah. mooby, the voice of reason. lux, can you explain to me why the redskins would even consider doing this? and how it would benefit them? and where would Holmes get his carries?
Can he play LG?
Otherwise it doesn't make much sense.
skinsfan_nn
08-20-2007, 07:50 AM
I hope this is a joke..? Another used up OLD MAN coming to DC, huh..... :doh:
Redskin Rich
08-20-2007, 08:37 AM
Oh... come on now.... don't we want him for the "VET MINIMUM" that we want every other older player for????????????
:laughing2
12thMan
08-20-2007, 09:40 AM
Why does it seem like the first washed up veteran, former superstar, just got released, just failed a physical, player becomes available, we feel the need to inquire should we bring him in as a Redskin?
mooby
08-20-2007, 10:03 AM
Well I for one would love to see Simeon Rice in a Skins uni, and maybe we could get Strahan to be his backup lolol. But yeah I agree with 12thman, some of these are getting ridiculous. It doesn't matter how stacked we are at a position, someone always has to ask if we should pickup another player at that position.