paulskinsfan
08-13-2007, 05:35 PM
Redskins Insider (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/)
Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!paulskinsfan 08-13-2007, 05:35 PM Redskins Insider (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/) GTripp0012 08-13-2007, 05:38 PM Well, if we were looking at a way to have James Thrash not be the No. 2 receiver, just remember that the last time Todd Pinkston held such a role, Thrash was the No. 1 receiver. Pinkston is garbage. Lloyd's probably better. TP won't make the cut. EARTHQUAKE2689 08-13-2007, 05:38 PM All I have to say is WHY? GTripp0012 08-13-2007, 05:40 PM All I have to say is WHY?They will torture us with irrelivant news until we give up! He can...longsnap well, I guess. Albright has competition! BleedBurgundy 08-13-2007, 05:42 PM All I have to say is WHY? Because playing for us is the only way he doesn't have to worry about #21 on gameday. wilsowilso 08-13-2007, 05:45 PM I would rather they just sign Art Monk or Gark Clark. FRPLG 08-13-2007, 05:48 PM I would rather they just sign Art Monk or Gark Clark. Seriously. Hell, sign Charley Taylor instead of this dead weight. djnemo65 08-13-2007, 05:50 PM Even if there's still a need there has to be someone better than Stinkston still out there. freddyg12 08-13-2007, 06:04 PM you think Bradford is looking that bad? dmek25 08-13-2007, 06:08 PM Even if there's still a need there has to be someone better than Stinkston still out there. why would they think there was a need? I'm not big on Mike Espy, but i would rather have him | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum