Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!

Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7

RMSkins
08-14-2007, 01:03 AM
Nope, he is currently not in the league.

His last reported activity was back in May when he worked out for TB.
That's strange, I wonder why no one has picked him up. I would take Bryant over Pinkston or Bradford anyday.

KLHJ2
08-14-2007, 01:08 AM
Read the Edit on my previous post.

RMSkins
08-14-2007, 01:13 AM
Yeah I just read your edit. I didn't realize that he was suspended.

jsarno
08-14-2007, 01:17 AM
Again, what about Keyshawn Johnson?
He had 70 receptions last year, 71 the year before, and 70 the year before that.
With the exception of his injury year (03- 10 games) he has had 63 or more receptions every year! The 63 was his rookie season.
He is a good possession receiver.

jsarno
08-14-2007, 01:18 AM
Keyshawn's stats:
Keyshawn Johnson statistics - pro-football-reference.com (http://www.profootball-reference.com/players/JohnKe00.htm)

Cowell
08-14-2007, 01:19 AM
Keyshawn Johnson announced his retirement maybe a month or two ago. And why would we sign Todd Pinkston. I hope this guy never sees the field as a Redskin, he's scared of the football.

jsarno
08-14-2007, 01:24 AM
Keyshawn Johnson announced his retirement maybe a month or two ago. And why would we sign Todd Pinkston. I hope this guy never sees the field as a Redskin, he's scared of the football.

It's only cause he was released from Carolina 3 weeks before hand. I think he could be lured out easily.
It's a lot better than the useless Pinkston.

SmootSmack
08-14-2007, 01:46 AM
Why Pinkston when we could have had Keyshawn Johnson?

I actually would have been more concerned with signing Keyshawn. You don't sign someone like Key as camp fodder or as 4th or 5th receiver. Signing him would have been a clear sign that the team is genuinely concerned about his WR situation.

At least with Pinkston, there's still a good possibility he's just another body

jsarno
08-14-2007, 01:49 AM
I actually would have been more concerned with signing Keyshawn. You don't sign someone like Key as camp fodder or as 4th or 5th receiver. Signing him would have been a clear sign that the team is genuinely concerned about his WR situation.

At least with Pinkston, there's still a good possibility he's just another body

I guess you have a good point.
The Skins have shown us they are dedicated to Lloyd and ARE, no matter what.
I just think that Keyshawn would have been a solid upgrade at the #2, but I do have faith that Lloyd is going to show up this year.

mheisig
08-14-2007, 06:29 AM
Looks like this guy will be an absolutely stellar addition to our receiving corps:

ls794MhIkU4

Presumably we only had to give up a 1st and 3rd round pick, right? I mean I know he wasn't even on a team to begin with, but we must have dealt some top draft picks away to get him because, hey, that's how we do things here.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum