Is Brady Quinn Being Selfish By Holding Out?

Heath Shuler is my example. He showed up in the pros and the high expectations and different skill sets that he thought he had mastered didn't really exist. His inability to meet basic read and react requirements was completely foreign to him and it gave him an extra large bitch slap the second he arrived in Washington. He got his fragile football pscyhe knocked loose and never recovered. He was in fact regressing in his development as a QB every day he played as a pro because in a sense he was just treading water trying to stay afloat.

I think Brady Quinn reminds me of Jake Plummer because of his athleticism and his swagger. Whenever Brady Quinn is surrounded by inferior talent like you say he had at ND I just don't think that he can make up the difference. At times Plummer showed that he could guide an inferior team to victory. The very good to great pro QB's can do exactly that on a regular basis. I guess calling him Jake Plummer Light was too harsh. Let's just call him Jake Plummer Like in my book.So you were saying that he reminds you of Jake Plummer, not that he will actually play like Jake Plummer?

Brady Quinn is a much better QB prospect than Plummer was though. Plummer wasn't a bad prospect, but he was below average.

I don't know too many QBs who can consistently guide an inferior team to victory. Your boy Tom Brady couldn't, Carson Palmer didn't, Vince Young did but only in college when he was athletically superior to everyone on the field. Peyton Manning...maybe, but even he couldn't consistently beat a superior team.

If you apply the same standard you are putting on Quinn to every prospective NFL QB, that he has to beat superior teams, I don't think you'd find a good one. Seemingly you not only have unrealistic expectations for Quinn, but a lot of other QBs, assuming no bias.

But I guess thats just my opinion of the situation.

So you were saying that he reminds you of Jake Plummer, not that he will actually play like Jake Plummer?

Brady Quinn is a much better QB prospect than Plummer was though. Plummer wasn't a bad prospect, but he was below average.

I don't know too many QBs who can consistently guide an inferior team to victory. Your boy Tom Brady couldn't, Carson Palmer didn't, Vince Young did but only in college when he was athletically superior to everyone on the field. Peyton Manning...maybe, but even he couldn't consistently beat a superior team.

If you apply the same standard you are putting on Quinn to every prospective NFL QB, that he has to beat superior teams, I don't think you'd find a good one. Seemingly you not only have unrealistic expectations for Quinn, but a lot of other QBs, assuming no bias.

But I guess thats just my opinion of the situation.

A really inferior team is another story and like you said even a great QB can't put that kind of burden on his shoulders on a consistent basis. I'm talking about teams that are maybe 5% to 10% inferior. I honestly think great QB's can make that up every single day that they step on the field.

Heath Shuler is my example. He showed up in the pros and the high expectations and different skill sets that he thought he had mastered didn't really exist. His inability to meet basic read and react requirements was completely foreign to him and it gave him an extra large bitch slap the second he arrived in Washington. He got his fragile football pscyhe knocked loose and never recovered. He was in fact regressing in his development as a QB every day he played as a pro because in a sense he was just treading water trying to stay afloat.Heath Shuler statistics - pro-football-reference.com (http://www.profootballreference.com/players/ShulHe00.htm)

Shuler was every bit as bad as you say, but even he did improve while in the NFL. He completed a pathetic 45% his rookie year, but then managed a Vick-esque 52% his sophomore year. Obviously he did not have the mental skill set to succeed at the NFL level, but he did learn on the same curve that all the other QBs of his era did. It just didn't matter in his case because he was so horrible.

Shuler was a bad NFL prospect anyway you slice it. But it can't be said that he couldn't get any better after age 22. He could and did improve beyond his rookie year, and then his career was cut short...because he still sucked.

A really inferior team is another story and like you said even a great QB can't put that kind of burden on his shoulders on a consistent basis. I'm talking about teams that are maybe 5% to 10% inferior. I honestly think great QB's can make that up every single day that they step on the field.Oh, and I'm in total agreement.

When theres a small gap in talent between two teams excluding the QB, then a great QB (inferior team) should be able to beat a bad QB (superior team) a majority of time.

But think about it: if you are looking at the total package, QBs and all, is the team with the great QB really inferior? Probably not. If the gap in QB skill is big enough, then they probably have the better team.

I think you are making it sound like that you have a football team...and then you have your quarterback variable. Of course, the QB is part of the football team, and you really can't analyze the accomplishments of the team without including the QB, and vice versa.

What about Tony Romo folks? He's going to be a legend I hear.

What about Tony Romo folks? He's going to be a legend I hear.I actually don't think hes very good. At all.

Romo has improved a lot through practicing with the Cowboys and learning from the vets in front of him all that time. He has improved a great deal since he entered the league I believe.

But I wouldn't be shocked if 2006 was his best season as a pro. Not because he's reached his peak yet, but because now defenses have film on him, and success won't come nearly as easily for the guy. I think the next 2-3 years are going to be very hard on Romo and the 'Boys and if Jerry Jones has the patience to live through his struggles, he may come out with a decent QB in 2009.

But for Romo, the honeymoon is over, and has been since like Week 15 of last season.

Heath Shuler statistics - pro-football-reference.com (http://www.profootballreference.com/players/ShulHe00.htm)

Shuler was every bit as bad as you say, but even he did improve while in the NFL. He completed a pathetic 45% his rookie year, but then managed a Vick-esque 52% his sophomore year. Obviously he did not have the mental skill set to succeed at the NFL level, but he did learn on the same curve that all the other QBs of his era did. It just didn't matter in his case because he was so horrible.

Shuler was a bad NFL prospect anyway you slice it. But it can't be said that he couldn't get any better after age 22. He could and did improve beyond his rookie year, and then his career was cut short...because he still sucked.

My point is that even though the stats did improve he was already broken mentally. Dosn't matter necessarily if it happens to an elite prospect or an undrafted free agent. Once your mind says I'm not confident anymore it's very hard to fight back. Not saying it doesn't happen. Shuler was broken and therefore was actually much much worse than where he was just before he came to that realization in the first place.

I actually don't think hes very good. At all.

Romo has improved a lot through practicing with the Cowboys and learning from the vets in front of him all that time. He has improved a great deal since he entered the league I believe.

But I wouldn't be shocked if 2006 was his best season as a pro. Not because he's reached his peak yet, but because now defenses have film on him, and success won't come nearly as easily for the guy. I think the next 2-3 years are going to be very hard on Romo and the 'Boys and if Jerry Jones has the patience to live through his struggles, he may come out with a decent QB in 2009.

But for Romo, the honeymoon is over, and has been since like Week 15 of last season.


While I was joking with the bit about legend, I do think Romo is a good QB. I've seen quite a bit of Matt Hasselbeck (can't be avoided) and Romo plays like him. He does a great job on the bootlegs and he knows when to throw it away. He also seems to throw the ball pretty well though he got careless with it towards the end of the season. If the Boy's running game doesn't get going I think he might have a tough time but that's about it. It pains me to say this but he's a good QB and probably will be until both Glen and TO lose a step.

Time will tell if he is any good.

While I was joking with the bit about legend, I do think Romo is a good QB. I've seen quite a bit of Matt Hasselbeck (can't be avoided) and Romo plays like him. He does a great job on the bootlegs and he knows when to throw it away. He also seems to throw the ball pretty well though he got careless with it towards the end of the season. If the Boy's running game doesn't get going I think he might have a tough time but that's about it. It pains me to say this but he's a good QB and probably will be until both Glen and TO lose a step.

Time will tell if he is any good.It's hard to get a projection on Romo with any confidence. Dude was undrafted so we don't learn anything from his college days, and all we have is 12 games of him to date, the first 8 he played lights out and the last 4 he was borderline awful.

The similarities with Hasselbeck are there but it only takes a few differences to send them to opposite sides of the NFL QB spectrum.

And to echo, indeed only time will tell for sure. My money's on a regression this year.