dmek25
07-23-2007, 05:57 PM
Brunell is the best back up we can ask for.
hessy , again to the aid of brunell:) but i agree. after sitting for the latter part of last season. he will be healthy again, and knows the playbook
skinsfan69
07-23-2007, 06:25 PM
Ok, so he threw 4 more TDs than he potentially gave the other team. :benched:
Brunell goes 23/10 and we want to bench him, yet we want a guy who goes 26/22 AND gets benched on the Raiders in his career? OK...makes sense.
Fumbles can be corrected for RBs, but not typically with QBs. Ask Dave Krieg.
Yes but your failing to mention he also went 27/15, 21/16 and 24/8.
Brunell can't take us to where we want to go and that is why he is on the bench.
skinsfan69
07-23-2007, 06:27 PM
Are we really having a 4 page discussion on Aaron Brooks?
:doh:
Friday can't come soon enough.
Well it's better than talking about dog fighting, or how do you think JC will do this year, or Portis/Betts. But you are correct. Friday needs to get here ASAP.
jsarno
07-23-2007, 08:11 PM
I find it odd that we are still talking about this. Of course I am just as much to blame, but it's still odd. :D
1- Brooks is not a good starting QB, or even an adaquate back up anymore (regardless of what 2 people on this site think)
2- He is not going to ever dawn a Skins Uni, so all this is moot.
3- Our qb scenario is set in stone, let's start the season already!!!
44Dive
07-24-2007, 08:28 PM
:oink: I'd take Mel Brooks over Aaron Brooks
skinsfan_nn
07-24-2007, 08:48 PM
Brooks won't EVER play for the SKINS! MB will be fine in his backup roll, if he's needed in a limited roll he will be just fine.
If it's an extended stay, good LORD willing it won't be (no injury bugs) different story, don't know how that might unfold.
GTripp0012
07-24-2007, 08:48 PM
Yes but your failing to mention he also went 27/15, 21/16 and 24/8.
Brunell can't take us to where we want to go and that is why he is on the bench.Part of the reason Brunell can't take us where we want to go is because hes on the bench...and hes on the bench so Jason Campbell doesnt have to be on the bench. Not for any other reason.
Just sayin :)
skinsfan69
07-24-2007, 10:57 PM
Part of the reason Brunell can't take us where we want to go is because hes on the bench...and hes on the bench so Jason Campbell doesnt have to be on the bench. Not for any other reason.
Just sayin :)
He can't take us to where we want to go cause he is not good enough at this point of his career.
70Chip
07-24-2007, 11:00 PM
:oink: I'd take Mel Brooks over Aaron Brooks
Certainly that goes without saying.
Crazyhorse1
07-25-2007, 12:09 AM
I'd cut Brunell and Collins for Brooks. Brooks is younger and more atheletic. He gives uss experience and quite a bit more talent from the back-up QB slot. Then give the third string to Palmer. Lets face it...Brunell is completed finished and we are paying Collins way to much. We can probably get Brooks pretty cheaply. What do you guys think?
Couldn't agree more about Brooks but Palmer and Casey ought to compete for 3rd.