Fins Cut Culpepper...Who picks him up?

Looking like a one-year deal with the Raiders is close to happening. Could be tonight.

Brunell is the best back-up in the league. Until he has to play.

LOL! Got that right!

The sack and fumble was caused by Jansen's missed block and Ramsey's
subsequent unconsciously. The interception wasn't his fault either and I don't recall the other fumble. He was playing well and moving the ball and had just put us in scoring position for the second time when Jansen blew it.

Brunell stunk up the field for the rest of the game. Playing two and a half quarters he threw for less than a hundred yards and failed to move the ball. Gibbs, of course, was fine with that.

However, I'm bowing out on this matter now. I don't want to deal with this business again. Returning to a time when fans turned on a QB who was our leading ground gainer over a four year period in behalf of a coach who had made a horrible decision even to bring Brunell in for the first place is something I don't want to do.

You are correct!

What you have to understand is the Gibbs is god crew will side with his every word no matter what. There is absolutly no possibility he was wrong about Ramsey, just like there's no possibility he was wrong about bringing in Brunell, other than a defense putting Brunell on their back and carrying him into the playoffs, while he was given the best starting field position in the NFL all season long he has done absolutly nothing! In fact his play in 2 of 3 seasons has been as bad as I have ever seen for a long term starting QB.

If anyone thinks we wouldn't made the playoffs in 2005 if Gibbs stuck with Ramsey, IMO they are sadly mistaken.

The rest of the NFL all knew what Brunell was coming out of Jack's. the book on Brunell was he no longer would take the hit, which didn't allow him to look down field, and we have seen absolutely nothing to contradict that!

Culpepper though I want nothing to do with!

[quote=D'BOYZ;330948]in Atlanta you have Vicks huge 130 mill contract with a 35 signing bonus hanging there so that even if tehy release him it's going to cost big time leavinf less leverage ofr a Contract.




Surely if Vick is convicted, Atlanta won't be responsible for that whole contract. I'm not an expert or anything, but that doesn't sound right. I would think there is a clause in the contract somewhere that says if you are a dumbass and you get yourself in deep doodoo and have to go away for a while, you ain't gettin' paid.

Raiders signed Culpepper.

http://www.kffl.com/images/hot_sign.jpgRaiders | Culpepper agrees to terms
Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:10:34 -0700
The NFL (http://www.kffl.com/team/77/nfl) Network reports the Oakland Raiders (http://www.kffl.com/team/28/nfl) have agreed to terms with QB Daunte Culpepper (http://www.kffl.com/player/1120/nfl) (Dolphins) after he passed a physical with the team.

It's supposed to be a 1-year deal.

KFFL - Hot Off the Wire - NFL Breaking News, Notes and Information (http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl)

Why not the Raiders? It would give them some leavage in the JaMarcus Russell contract. Plus he could probably start and bring JaMarcus Russell along slowly. JaMarcus Russell probably will probably miss a good amount of training camp with a hold out.

Not to toot my own horn, but to toot my own horn, I knew it was a good fit two weeks ago.

Culpepper just wants to show the world that he still has skills...he's a moron for thinking about the Raiders, they won't help his numbers.

Culpepper just wants to show the world that he still has skills...he's a moron for thinking about the Raiders, they won't help his numbers.But he will help the Raiders. A lot.

In turn, that may give Culpepper all the help he needs. Remember, this franchise has not had a remotely NFL caliber QB since Gannon retired in February of 2005.

But he will help the Raiders. A lot.

In turn, that may give Culpepper all the help he needs. Remember, this franchise has not had a remotely NFL caliber QB since Gannon retired in February of 2005.

Yeah, but he can't throw to himself!
Their line sucks, their WR's suck, the TE's suck...so it will be Culpepper vs whoever they are playing.

Yeah, but he can't throw to himself!
Their line sucks, their WR's suck, the TE's suck...so it will be Culpepper vs whoever they are playing.

I wouldn't say that their WR's suck, Jerry Porter can be good if given the oppertunity. Last year he really didn't do himself any favors by butting heads with the coaching staff. And who knows about Mike Williams, now that he is reunited with an USC offensive coach he may find his place again. If anything I would be more worried about the HIGH SCHOOL caliber offensive line that the Raiders have. Any O-Line that gives up 72 sacks can't be any better than your average High School O-Line. I would hope that the coaching staff out in Oakland don't expect Culpepper to scramble to much, because I don't think that he can anymore...