Give Big Mike The Damn Ball! [Archive] - Page 3 - Commanders Post at The Warpath

skinsnut

07-06-2007, 10:56 AM

MIke Sellers is great inside the 10 for catching td's in the flat.

As much as I'd like to agree with you guys about how great Sellers is....the fact that he scored so many TD's had more to do with play calling. At that point in 05, no one expected a "blocking" FB the size of Sellers to be a receiver. They were all keying on the others, especially Cooley and Moss.
I would think that if they tried to duplicate these passes this year that the coverage would be much tighter. I dont know if Sellers can reproduce those TD figures anymore. However, they could use him as a decoy to open up more space for the others.

Regarding his running ability....I love the fact that he is a hammer, but he is slow...the problem is that we dont really have a clutch short yardage back. As you all know our short yardage wasn't too hot last year. I really think that is one of the reasons the Skins brought in TJ Duckett. He was supposedly a starting caliber running back who was also a hammer.
If you were to put Duckett and Sellers head to head, I think Sellers would be better for short but this still aint the long term answer....we need more to our power rushing game and I see Sellers as a back up to a true short yardage guy.

Rock did that for a while for us pretty well, but I believe he had some trouble last year moving the chains.....perhaps this was due to the shift towards zone blocking or something?

Question: (really think about this)
Who is our best 3rd and 1 specialty back?

(If you say Portis....you are crazy! cause you know that aint true!)
Betts, Sellers, Rock?


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > Give Big Mike The Damn Ball! PDA Give Big Mike The Damn Ball! Pages : 1 2 [3] GoSkins! 07-05-2007, 09:16 PM He should get the ball about 25% of the time on short yardage (runs). That is enough to make sure the defenses can't key on Betts or Portis. He won't break a big run, but he almost always gets the minimum yards required. EARTHQUAKE2689 07-06-2007, 01:04 AM MIke Sellers is great inside the 10 for catching td's in the flat. skinsnut 07-06-2007, 10:56 AM MIke Sellers is great inside the 10 for catching td's in the flat. As much as I'd like to agree with you guys about how great Sellers is....the fact that he scored so many TD's had more to do with play calling. At that point in 05, no one expected a "blocking" FB the size of Sellers to be a receiver. They were all keying on the others, especially Cooley and Moss. I would think that if they tried to duplicate these passes this year that the coverage would be much tighter. I dont know if Sellers can reproduce those TD figures anymore. However, they could use him as a decoy to open up more space for the others. Regarding his running ability....I love the fact that he is a hammer, but he is slow...the problem is that we dont really have a clutch short yardage back. As you all know our short yardage wasn't too hot last year. I really think that is one of the reasons the Skins brought in TJ Duckett. He was supposedly a starting caliber running back who was also a hammer. If you were to put Duckett and Sellers head to head, I think Sellers would be better for short but this still aint the long term answer....we need more to our power rushing game and I see Sellers as a back up to a true short yardage guy. Rock did that for a while for us pretty well, but I believe he had some trouble last year moving the chains.....perhaps this was due to the shift towards zone blocking or something? Question: (really think about this) Who is our best 3rd and 1 specialty back? (If you say Portis....you are crazy! cause you know that aint true!) Betts, Sellers, Rock? Monkeydad 07-06-2007, 12:54 PM Question: (really think about this) Who is our best 3rd and 1 specialty back? (If you say Portis....you are crazy! cause you know that aint true!) Betts, Sellers, Rock? Campbell. :D