Rank our OLine among the 32 teams

KC has lost will sheilds and willie roaf and havent added anyone no way they are still top 5

Will we all get co-writing credit?Y'all definately get a special thanks mention...its the best I can do.

If you're talking about our current line, I would say top 10, one could make an argument for top 15.

My reasoning for saying top 10 is for obvious reasons: You line up Portis he's a 1300 yd rusher; You line up Betts, he goes over a 1,000 yds too.

If you break down the line by position, one could say we're pretty solid at every position. But I just don't think you can have a losing record and at the same time claim an offensive line that's better than 10.

When healthy Samuels and Jansen are two of the best in the business. Ditto Randy Thomas. He's not only Pro-Bowl material, but is usually pretty durable.

Y'all definately get a special thanks mention...its the best I can do.

Why don't you tell us where you think they rank and then we can debate that?

Top 5 no doubt.

Last year they were the only line in the league to be in the top 7 in rushing yards and sacks allowed.

Atlanta, Jax, San Fran, and San Diego above us. I'll put KC and Pitt above us for the fact that they have been good for a relatively long time. So... 123456 7

I'm thinking we are in the top 5. I'm basing that on last years performance. One could say "well we lost Dockery", I never thought he was that great anyway. I'll bet that whoever is in the LG position they'll be at least on the same level if not better than Dockery. I'm thinking Wade will start off the season and I'm hoping Whitticker takes over later in the season so we can have some youth on the line.

Atlanta, Jax, San Fran, and San Diego above us. I'll put KC and Pitt above us for the fact that they have been good for a relatively long time. So... 123456 7


I think I'm more inclined to lean toward your ranking, BSB. I would say maybe 8 or so. Again, my main contention is we didn't have a winning record.

But I don't have a problem with 7, or 5 for that matter.

With the lingering problem at LG I would say we are somewhere around 10-12.
This experiment with Wade is not going to work.

This is being modest, I'll say #6 overall.