Bears waive troubled DT Tank Johnson

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Riggo44
06-25-2007, 07:20 PM
I don't think Gibbs would sign off on it. But I would love to have him if the price is right. He could definitely help are D.

skinsfan69
06-25-2007, 07:35 PM
This guy is BAD news........PACTIRD Jr., he'll never learn. No suprise here.
100% TOTAL PIECE OF SHIT!

I agree. The minute the guy gets out of jail he's talking about how he's a changed man. How he's going to be the NFL man of the year. And then he's out at 3:30am possibly driving drunk?? WTF is that all about? If this is true no way should we touch this guy. Does anyone think Gibbs, who is Mr. Character, is going to sign off on this? No way in hell.

Warrior1971
06-25-2007, 07:35 PM
Don't make the mistake with him, I don't see him benifiting us at all, only being a distraction we don't need.

GoSkins!
06-25-2007, 07:45 PM
I don't think Gibbs would sign off on it.

No, it would have to be a guy more like Jerry Jones.

skinsfan_nn
06-25-2007, 07:50 PM
I agree. The minute the guy gets out of jail he's talking about how he's a changed man. How he's going to be the NFL man of the year. And then he's out at 3:30am possibly driving drunk?? WTF is that all about? If this is true no way should we touch this guy. Does anyone think Gibbs, who is Mr. Character, is going to sign off on this? No way in hell.


Correct. Joe would not touch this LOSER with a 10 foot dummy stick, might get some on him! Nice to know this TARD could turn his life around for a whole 15 minutes.

NO WAY IN HELL HE WILL BE IN DC FOR ANY AMOUNT!

ChickenMonkey
06-25-2007, 07:55 PM
Tank is a great football player, he'd upgrade our D Line automatically,
he did his time and this new mishap seems to be just that, a mishap, no charges filled ......Id give him the benifit of the doubt and sign him to the vet minimum,,,,Cant hurt to have help where we hurt most last season

ms

12thMan
06-25-2007, 08:42 PM
Tank is a great football player, he'd upgrade our D Line automatically,
he did his time and this new mishap seems to be just that, a mishap, no charges filled ......Id give him the benifit of the doubt and sign him to the vet minimum,,,,Cant hurt to have help where we hurt most last season

ms

This actually seems to be the most reasonable post yet. The fact of the matter is, Tank is going to get signed by someone. The real question is, will the Skins take a good look at this. But I'll tellya what, if we think Joe Gibbs and Co. aren't thinking about it, we're fooling ourselves.

TheMalcolmConnection
06-25-2007, 08:44 PM
Honestly, there's people in this league a lot worse-off. I'd consider him without a doubt. I won't say vet minimum, but I'll definitely say a one year deal with a behavioral clause.

MTK
06-25-2007, 08:50 PM
I can guarantee there's no way this front office is seriously considering this guy. I applaud the Bears for acting swiftly with him. They gave him a clear order to keep his nose clean, and it didn't take long at all for him to F things up.

JoeRedskin
06-25-2007, 08:58 PM
If he played ANY other position but DL I'd say no way. BUT, given our line problems, I'd take him.

BTW - since he is still under his rookie contract, he is waived and does not have outright release UNLESS all 32 teams pass on him. Instead, the claiming team gets him for two years at the rookie contract minimums (He got all his money in his rookie signing bonus).

So, if we claim him off waivers, we get him for 8 games this year and a full season next year at the minimums.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum