A good off-season review for the Redskins

NFL.com - NFL News (http://nfl.com/news/story/10234177)

We actually don't get bashed here.

I do think we drafted fairly well with the picks we had, but we really needed to get a DE or DT instead of the extra LB. We can have a great secondary, but if the opposing QB has an easy time in the pocket, anyone can get burned bad. That is why I hope we can still get a FA D lineman, and not go for McCardell.

I do think we drafted fairly well with the picks we had, but we really needed to get a DE or DT instead of the extra LB. We can have a great secondary, but if the opposing QB has an easy time in the pocket, anyone can get burned bad. That is why I hope we can still get a FA D lineman, and not go for McCardell.

Who did you have in mind?

I think landry and taylor will become a great tandem in this league for years to come. However if we cant put presser on the QB, we could be in for another rough year on Defense! Also I think JC will become the breakout player in 07.

Gus, the year before last, and the year before that, etc. How did we get pressure on the quarterback? (Hint, it was a good secondary that allowed us to play man coverage and blitz). We don't need super passrushers at DE as long as our secondary doesnt get so banged up.

Gus, the year before last, and the year before that, etc. How did we get pressure on the quarterback? (Hint, it was a good secondary that allowed us to play man coverage and blitz). We don't need super passrushers at DE as long as our secondary doesnt get so banged up.

Yeah, but even adequate pass rushers are necessary when the secondary suffers crushing injuries like we saw last year with Springs. You still need guys up front who can generate some pressure in case the secondary falters. We didn't have that in 2006 and hence, we set the NFL record for fewest number of sacks in a non-strike season.

(cue the 'sacks don't mean everything crowd'...)

Either the coaches are insane, or they have good reason to be confident in the defensive lineman currently on the roster. I'll tend to go with the latter.

you realist, you

Either the coaches are insane, or they have good reason to be confident in the defensive lineman currently on the roster. I'll tend to go with the latter.

I see. So coaches are always right, and they are NEVER to be questioned.

After all, what better evidence of their wizardry was there than the 2006 season?

I see. So coaches are always right, and they are NEVER to be questioned.

After all, what better evidence of their wizardry was there than the 2006 season?

I don't think I said anything like that at all, I simply said I tend to believe they know what they're doing. What's more crazy... trusting the coaches or some armchair fan's opinion?