Eagles Sign Ian Scott

Pages : 1 2 [3]

MTK
05-04-2007, 09:19 AM
He was out there for quite a while... there must be some reasons for that.

EARTHQUAKE2689
05-04-2007, 11:37 AM
He was out there for quite a while... there must be some reasons for that.


people were cheap i guess

SmootSmack
01-02-2008, 03:45 PM
I don't think we truly need him, and this probably isn't the time to talk about this per se. But I just thought I'd mention that the Eagles have released Ian Scott.

GMScud
01-02-2008, 03:50 PM
I don't think we truly need him, and this probably isn't the time to talk about this per se. But I just thought I'd mention that the Eagles have released Ian Scott.

Didn't they release him a while ago? He was a big contributor on that Chicago D last year that was so dominant. I'm surprised he flopped in Philly.

SmootSmack
01-02-2008, 04:15 PM
He was on IR, but I don't think he was released until today

Redskins_P
01-02-2008, 04:38 PM
Who needs Ian Scott when we have Monty!

freddyg12
01-02-2008, 04:52 PM
Looking back at this thread, some people wanted Rice - he was released by Denver a few weeks back, while I said Kearse if he was cut & healthy. He's been inactive for 6-7 weeks now. Not that we'd want him now, but I wonder if Philly will cut him next?

GridIron26
01-02-2008, 05:47 PM
Uh I thought we released Salave'a??

cpayne5
01-02-2008, 06:13 PM
Uh I thought we released Salave'a??

Check the dates in this thread. ;)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum