The Official 2007 Draft Discussion Thread

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41

Beemnseven
04-28-2007, 04:06 PM
I was in the Gaines Adam or Alan Branch camp because I thought we needed to upgrade our defensive line, BUT drafting Landry will really improve our passing defense and we can now concentrate our 2nd day picks on picking up d-linemen. We've now got two safeties who are pretty interchangeable, and a ton of depth in the secondary with Fox, Prioleau. This pick will make ST even more dangerous, because now you don't know who is coming or staying back, and both guys can cover and hit.


Well, you would think ... but don't be so sure. Watch them take a tight end, a receiver, an offensive guard. It would be a small miracle if they are able to find anyone in the 5th round who could make an impact no matter where they pick.

This front office just doesn't like to take defensive linemen high in the draft.

skinsy
04-28-2007, 04:07 PM
What people don't realize is that a good secondary = sacks. Our D- line looked so bad last year because our secondary couldn't cover my grandma (and she runs a 4.9 40), and quarterbacks were making quick throws. The D Line wasn't great, but it wasn't as nearly as bad as it looked. We can pick up some veterans later. Landry is solid at 6, he was the best on the board.

DGreen28
04-28-2007, 04:08 PM
WHAT!! The skins have 8 CB/SS/FS. Why is a team that had 19 sacks all last year and one of the worst run defenses in the league. Drafting a safety. Skins need help on the Dline. Bad Pick

JWsleep
04-28-2007, 04:16 PM
Given that they didn't have a trade partner, they took the highest rated D player on their board. Now maybe they didn't evaluate talent correctly (a serious possibility with this group, no doubt) but given that, they made a responsible move as a FO.

Plus, it's clear that Williams believes that the key to his D is proper effective safety play. Now he's got great young talent there. As for the D line, let's hope they can pick up a decent late rounder or late FA to bolster things, and maybe if our LBs and Safeties can play ball properly, our D-line will look better. It's not impossible that bad secondary and LB play made the line look worse... (obviously, this is not conventional wisdom, but perhaps that what GW and co think--and he did have top-10 Ds for us).

A responsible pick--not flashy. That's pretty good from this bunch. And I assume that no one wanted to trade down with us, which is what we all really wanted.

offiss
04-28-2007, 04:29 PM
What makes anyone think that just because you draft a D-lineman that it solves our problems? The fact is not 1 of these guy's had the talent that M. Williams had coming out last year, not as fast, not as strong, not as tall, and look at what kind of a difference he made for Houston. My feeling on these lineman is that they are not impact type lineman, which would leave us in the same position next year, but with Landry I believe barring injury we are set at the safety position for a long time.

The only player who I wouldn't have had a problem with at #6 at DL was Anderson, but there wasen't a ton of film on him to really get a feel for him, but he may be the 1 player that got away. On the other hand none of these guys are S. Merriman in whom I wanted 2 years ago. When it's all said I believe we drafted a difference maker in Landry, I don't believe the other top Lineman are.

Slingin Sammy 33
04-28-2007, 04:31 PM
Initially I didn't like the pick, but with the addition of Smoot and Fletcher, I think this pick might be OK. Smoot and FLetcher will improve our run support at the second level to allow Taylor and Landry to play more "Center Field" in Cover 2 rather than having to play run support first. I remeber too many times on replay watching Taylor/Arch/Fox do the "attack the line...then Oh @$&#"...and turn and run to catch up to a receiver behind them or down the middle.
I think Carter will play better this year, Griffin if healthy, will be fine for another year or two. The two young kids and Salavea at DT are not Pro-Bowlers, but not awful either. Wynn and Daniels can platoon at DE. My biggest concern is how long it will take Landry to adjust and not be the weak link in the secondary, hopefully not past Week 8 (wishful thinking I'm afraid). Nothing we can do until tomorrow now.

Skins_4_Lyfe
04-28-2007, 05:09 PM
Cowgirls are on the clock...hope they take Quinn. LOL

Big C
04-28-2007, 05:12 PM
branch is still on the board...

skinsfan_nn
04-28-2007, 05:13 PM
Cowgirls are on the clock...hope they take Quinn. LOL
Not gonna happen.

skinsguy
04-28-2007, 05:22 PM
The Browns take Brady Quinn.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum