Pacman suspended for entire 2007 season!

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

GhettoDogAllStars
04-10-2007, 02:53 PM
is there a clear definition of this? it seems like that has a wide range in meaning. with all these posts, let me say again that i think Jones got what he deserved

I know what you mean. It does sound subjective. However, I'm willing to bet that there is a definition of it in the CBA.

GoSkins!
04-10-2007, 02:53 PM
Where is my lawyer!!! How dare they ask a guy to act professional on his own time. It's not like kids watch football or look up to these guys or emulate them.

I guess now he will have to work for T.O. as a housekeeper or something so that he can learn how to behave badly while still receiving a check.

MTK
04-10-2007, 02:54 PM
I like it, Goodell is sending a strong message.

FRPLG
04-10-2007, 02:55 PM
I'm not sure i buy this. i would think that the NFL would have access to any legal records as an employer. but then again, the confidentiality laws are very strict

It is a FACT that he kept a Georgia arrest for ASSAULTING A POLICE officer a secret from the Titans. The Personal Conduct Policy explicitly states that players have to tell teams about any legal incidents.

FRPLG
04-10-2007, 02:59 PM
I'm not arguing the personal conduct code. my argument is that there have been a ton of football players in the past that have been arrested, and suffered little or no punishment. why now?

I think because the NFL is starting to have an image problem and Goodell is making player resposibility one of his big time issues. I think the fact that they have been too lenient in the past shouldn't mean they can't be more diligent now. Maybe the fact that they have been so lenient in the past has led to this "uptick" in problems.

I say "uptick" because I tend to think that this is no more of a problem now than in the past but it is simply being reported more and now the league has image issues.

ArtMonkDrillz
04-10-2007, 03:00 PM
I'm not arguing the personal conduct code. my argument is that there have been a ton of football players in the past that have been arrested, and suffered little or no punishment. why now?
Now because:
-There are 3 ESPN channels, the NFL Network, and various other sports stations on 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
-People spend the entire day on sports-related Internet sites (like myself)
-The current over-consumption of sports, that didn't really exist on this level in the past
-The NBA brawl
-The steroid scandal and the black-eye it has given all sports
-There is a new commissioner and he's putting his foot down before all hell breaks loose

dmek25
04-10-2007, 03:03 PM
good post grillz, and i agree. but with a union the initial suspension is always the toughest one to uphold, because all future suspensions will look at this as the ground breaker.

gibbs4life
04-10-2007, 03:08 PM
I think it's the right descision!

it,s great to see this the commish is doing the right thing here when it comes to these dumb asses.... do the crime do the time ..

i applaud this...

ArtMonkDrillz
04-10-2007, 03:10 PM
good post grillz, and i agree. but with a union the initial suspension is always the toughest one to uphold, because all future suspensions will look at this as the ground breaker.I agree with you and I do think they'll half-heartedly appeal it just because they feel like they have to.
But, wasn't the union pushing for stiffer penalties for these kinds of violations recently? It's like when Carson Palmer came out and said how he hates that he has to be associated with guys like this. So while I think the union will have put up some kind of protest, I doubt it thinks or even really wants to change anything.


The bottom line in all of this: WVU is to blame!

dmek25
04-10-2007, 03:13 PM
damn those hillbillies

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum