EXoffender
03-30-2007, 07:48 PM
CHI was smart enough to get the Archuleta deal done before discussing trading Briggs. They would've been giving up a lot more than a 6th rounder for him and Marshall. But then again, we always get the short end of the stick.
EXoffender
03-30-2007, 07:50 PM
If they wan't Marshall, give him to them. The only good upside to having Marshall, is his contract.
wolfeskins
03-30-2007, 08:23 PM
If they wan't Marshall, give him to them. The only good upside to having Marshall, is his contract.
thats statement tells me that your stupid.
GiantsSuck703
03-30-2007, 09:18 PM
You guys really think that Lance Briggs can't play our system. He's 6'1 and 240 lbs. I think he can play our system and would be better than anyone who has been ther for years. I really don't see what the problem is if we bring in a LB in the prime of his career. The guy is a ball hawk and would excell with GW he's got speed, instinks, he's always around the ball. Why would he be so bad for us? I think we need to give the guy his due as a great football player.
I don't think he's the right thing we need right now, but he is a damn good football player.
Its not that I dont think he can play in our system, Im just scared that he wont work out and we will have given up alot to get him, from 6th to 31st is a hell of a drop
EARTHQUAKE2689
03-30-2007, 09:20 PM
Its not that I dont think he can play in our system, Im just scared that he wont work out and we will have given up alot to get him, from 6th to 31st is a hell of a drop
if we do it i guess we have targeted someone at 31
vaoutlaws2006
03-31-2007, 07:13 AM
best trio of linebackers..............accompanied by the worst D-line and secondary in the league
you said it. I would have hoped the dline and secondary would be addressed this offseason...we got smoot so that helps the secondary and having the 6th pick should be used to address the d line.
SkinsFanSince91
03-31-2007, 02:09 PM
"The Bears will have a need at linebacker if Briggs is gone, so a player like LeMar Marshall (104 tackles last year), who is going to be a backup if Briggs joins new addition London Fletcher on the Redskins defense, might interest Jerry Angelo."
This is not saying they want Marshall. This is Kirwan speculating.
I agree.
We dont need LB's anymore than we need losing seasons!
If we trade for anything, let it be for Calvin Johnson and a 3rd rounder from Cleveland!
The Posse 2007!!!
SC Skins Fan
03-31-2007, 02:22 PM
I agree.
We dont need LB's anymore than we need losing seasons!
If we trade for anything, let it be for Calvin Johnson and a 3rd rounder from Cleveland!
The Posse 2007!!!
So we'd trade up three spots and get a third round pick too!!! What a Deal!!!! Back to reality land, I've kind of resigned myself to some sort of deal getting done and kind of bracing myself for that. If the Skins were to include someone like Marshall I will have to live with that too. If they do trade Marshall or someone like that I just NEVER WANT TO HEAR ANYONE AT REDSKINS PARK SAY "TRUE REDSKINS" EVER AGAIN. Every "True Redskin" that we've had on the team is unceremoniously run out of town on a rail and I'm kind of getting sick of hearing them say "True Redskins" and then bring in high price players from other teams to take the place of guys like Ryan Clark, Antonio Pierce, and Lemar Marshall. I've come to grips with whatever they do, but I wish they would at least be honest and stop blowing smoke up our collective . . .