Da Bears want Marshall [Archive] - Page 2 - Commanders Post at The Warpath


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > Da Bears want Marshall PDA Da Bears want Marshall Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 number21isabadman 03-30-2007, 01:50 AM it wasent even a good deal as it stood jrocx69 03-30-2007, 01:54 AM "Im not saying Washington is a pro bowler" LMAO, whatta doof Big C 03-30-2007, 02:01 AM would make a lot of sense marshall going to the bears in the deal if it were to happen. would be less competition for rocky for those who think he wouldnt see the field at all, and its not like marshall has the potential to get much better, seeing as he is already 30 Darrell_Green_28 03-30-2007, 02:06 AM k then let them throw in a second rounder then so if we get him then , would we not want a backup? oh yeah you dont need depth offiss 03-30-2007, 02:37 AM As I said earlier the Bears know we are dumb enough to give them even more so why bother with a no brainer of a sweetheart deal when we will give up even more. That's why they played in the SB last season and we are picking 6th, or should I say were! If we really want out of the 6th we should start trading down we would winde up with a lot more than we are going to with Briggs, a couple of trade downs should net at least a 2 and a 3, then we can go get all that talent in the second and 3rd round Gibbs has been babbling about. On a lesser note I believe our 52 million dollar back is now on equal time with his backup L. Betts according to Gibbs, but at least he will technically be the starter. Hurray! offiss 03-30-2007, 02:52 AM Is there a possibility that we can throw Gibbs in with this trade? GTripp0012 03-30-2007, 02:53 AM As I said earlier the Bears know we are dumb enough to give them even more so why bother with a no brainer of a sweetheart deal when we will give up even more. That's why they played in the SB last season and we are picking 6th, or should I say were! If we really want out of the 6th we should start trading down we would winde up with a lot more than we are going to with Briggs, a couple of trade downs should net at least a 2 and a 3, then we can go get all that talent in the second and 3rd round Gibbs has been babbling about. On a lesser note I believe our 52 million dollar back is now on equal time with his backup L. Betts according to Gibbs, but at least he will technically be the starter. Hurray!Well, we certainly have proven to be horrible negotiators in the past. In this case, we could have our hands tied. We've already come to an agreement with Briggs, so it may be very tough to get away from the deal now. However, we really don't have much more at all to give for Briggs. I just hope we don't unload any 2008 picks and perpetuate the problem further. I guess when we fall in love with a player, anything can happen. GTripp0012 03-30-2007, 02:57 AM I would have a ton of respect for the decision makers if Chicago asked for more and we told them to go shove it. But like Offiss said, what are the chances of that? Gmanc711 03-30-2007, 03:06 AM Is there a possibility that we can throw Gibbs in with this trade? Or anyone on this team associated with decison making! This is all Brunells fault! JGisLordOfTheRings 03-30-2007, 03:24 AM F Chicago and F Lance Briggs! That deal was ALREADY in thir favor....WTF ARE THEY THINKING???? "Oh, the deals already bad for us?" "Yes, sir." "Awww, **** it. Throw in a couple linebackers or something just to be nice. That'll do it."