MTK
03-27-2007, 03:27 PM
Note to self: Move Schneed back to the top of the potential mod list. ;)
How the Lance Briggs deal started.MTK 03-27-2007, 03:27 PM Note to self: Move Schneed back to the top of the potential mod list. ;) MTK 03-27-2007, 03:27 PM So Lets See, Dan Was Drunk For This Deal Right? So Dude Must Of Been Craked Out When The Did The Aa Deal!!!! Speaking Of Aa, If They Make This Deal Im Gonna Sign That Fool Up!!! word! Schneed10 03-27-2007, 03:34 PM Note to self: Move Schneed back to the top of the potential mod list. ;) LOL! But seriously, after all the debating (which is good cause it's fun to go back and forth on the team's personnel needs) I'm leaning more towards your view that this trade rumor is bogus. You know how much of a stickler the 'Skins usually are for the whole points value of draft picks. They usually stick pretty tight to the chart to help them value trades. We're squandering quite a few points by getting Briggs. Our pick is worth 1600, their pick is worth 600 or so, so in the proposed deal Briggs would be worth 1000. That's the equivalent of a mid-first rounder. I mean to the 'Skins really value him that highly? I guess it's possible but I wouldn't. I'd be asking for a 3rd rounder in that deal. Plus then there's all the stuff that PFT threw out there, explaining why Briggs isn't the best fit. Plus then there's the possibility that Danny and Rosenhaus are conspiring, with Rosenhaus's motivation being to drive up interest in Briggs, and with Danny's motivation being to scare Denver into making the Bly deal that's on the table. Of course, I could be wrong, and all of this could be wishful thinking. But I can see this rumor fizzling. Skinny Tee 03-27-2007, 03:42 PM Has anyone even determined whether that Briggs was a beneficiary of his scheme or surrounding. Maybe the fact that there were other Pro Bowlers on the Bears D was the reason he was playing at that Pro Bowl level? Who knows, but it seems that the Skins FO has trouble assessing value to prospective free agents and Briggs situation doesn't seem to be any different. Beemnseven 03-27-2007, 03:42 PM Why? Because a defense has three linebackers on the field roughly half of the time. In the nickel and dime defenses, linebackers are replaced by defensive backs. Teams use the nickel whenever the opponent brings in a third receiver. Typically, that happens in second and long or third and more than three or four yards. This one has me scratching my head -- in a nickel formation, doesn't the middle linebacker typically head for the sideline, leaving in the two presumably speedier outside linebackers? In this situation, I could see Briggs and Washington in on these types of plays. FRPLG 03-27-2007, 03:46 PM This one has me scratching my head -- in a nickel formation, doesn't the middle linebacker typically head for the sideline, leaving in the two presumably speedier outside linebackers? In this situation, I could see Briggs and Washington in on these types of plays. I think for most teams. Actually I think most teams just keep their two best cover LBs in regardless of inside or outside. TheMalcolmConnection 03-27-2007, 03:46 PM Ohh, I see, we should get him to be our nickel LB! ;) MTK 03-27-2007, 03:48 PM I think Snyder and Rosenhaus are having a good laugh over this whole deal. Neither of them are favorites of the media and vice versa so I'm sure they are getting a big kick over floating this rumor out there. FRPLG 03-27-2007, 03:49 PM I guess all I care about is not how these shenanigans started but how they end. FRPLG 03-27-2007, 03:49 PM I think Snyder and Rosenhaus are having a good laugh over this whole deal. Neither of them are favorites of the media and vice versa so I'm sure they are getting a big kick over floating this rumor out there. I hope and pray. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum