JoeRedskin
03-17-2007, 07:53 PM
fox is good thats why we resigned him.archy is good but didnt fit our system.i mean look how good he was in st.louis.hes just a fan hater.
why exactly is he a "fan hater"? As for not fitting our system, true but, sorry, he was never more than mediocre in st. louis. he's a linebacker in safety's body w/ the football instincts of a blind gopher.
dall-assblows
03-17-2007, 08:12 PM
but arch played so good last season. he was our mvp in my eyes
dmek25
03-17-2007, 09:26 PM
fox is good thats why we resigned him.archy is good but didnt fit our system.i mean look how good he was in st.louis.hes just a fan hater.
fox is good? good at what? he is a career journeyman, at best
JankySpanky80
03-17-2007, 10:10 PM
Fox does not need to be anywhere but special teams. Skins need a covering SS to mesh with Taylor.
EARTHQUAKE2689
03-17-2007, 10:22 PM
Fox does not need to be anywhere but special teams. Skins need a covering SS to mesh with Taylor.
ok if we trade down and maybe sign ian scott how about laron landry
GridIron26
03-17-2007, 11:08 PM
Denver - maybe AA for Bly and 2nd tound pick?
No, I don't want another good cb in our depth.. Once we have too many good cbs, it's bound for one of them to complain about not playing much..
EARTHQUAKE2689
03-17-2007, 11:18 PM
No, I don't want another good cb in our depth.. Once we have too many good cbs, it's bound for one of them to complain about not playing much..
man what the hell are you talking about carlos rogers right now is average ay best and shawn springs cant stay healthy our best corner to me health wise and skill wise right now cause to be honest if the season were to start today i am kind of edgey on the secondary thats just me
skinsfan_nn
03-18-2007, 10:01 AM
No, I don't want another good cb in our depth.. Once we have too many good cbs, it's bound for one of them to complain about not playing much..
Never have to much depth at corner. Rember last year, we had none!
Bly for Arch, and maybe even a late round pick...in a second!
holcknowsbest
03-18-2007, 11:21 AM
hey i finally have another fan of the trade back and nab laron laundry. this guy is a stone cold beast much like taylor but with better cover skills. he played corner two years at lsu but grew out of the position...haha i mean the guys arms are huge! you give me smoot, springs, rogers, taylor, landry, and potentially dre bly? that shores up a lot of holes and makes us extrememly versitle up front where we could afford have those crazy blitz schemes we had in 2003. i think the more secondary help the more creative you can get up front........but i am also a believer in pass rush leads to good coverage, its a two sided argument.....but give me laron landry and i will take the bulk up the secondary argument.
holcknowsbest
03-18-2007, 11:25 AM
plus landry will only make taylor a better player i promise you that, they will feed off of each other. could be some exciting hits and plays made in the secondary next year if this ends up coming true.....my opinion on AA is that he like almost every player in the league is a scheme player and he doesnt fit our scheme....i dont care what we do with him though cause we will eat his money one way or another, so trade him, cut him, keep him i dont care about him.