Russell to the skins?

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13

rvd420
03-16-2007, 03:18 PM
:Flush: whoever thinks we are getting russell needs to stop smoking meth cause it aint happenin.

rvd420
03-16-2007, 03:22 PM
:smashfrea we are not trading portis and we do need a tall reciever but it will be in the later rounds if we do.

Southpaw
03-16-2007, 03:31 PM
And specifically at the Warpath, we are supposed to be smarter than fans at other Redskin sites. This is where we come to have KNOWLEDGABLE discussion about the Redskins.


.... :rofl: :laughing2

100% PURE WHOOP ASS
03-16-2007, 05:49 PM
just what we should do, take 2 players we dont need :(

2 players we dont need....are you serious, outside of moss/ Lioyd and randell at best is poor 2nd and 3rd receivers, antwann a great returned, but Calvin Johnson is a beast a freak of nature, and adrian peterson, is probably going to be a stud in 2 yrs, we still have Betts, and Jason Campbell will have a speedster and big target to through to, which means betts and peterson, will keep the 8 man from honest.....I LOVE PORTIS, THINK HES GREAT, but how much longer you think he will hold up, i hope forever but last year is a bad sign,........but sorr dmek25, i guess your opinion is the only one that counts

rvd420
03-16-2007, 09:21 PM
:smashfrea were more than likely trading down.we have more than one need.portis gets hurt one year and everybody thinks hes done.how sad.
portis is goin no where.

holcknowsbest
03-17-2007, 12:52 AM
wait wait, we werent there looking at russell, we are there looking at laron laundry. the falcons love this guy and they are at 10, if we show intrest in laundry then that gives us another potential trade partner. its all gamesmanship by gibbs and company......why would we want russell when we already have a guy with the same style and skills as him. its a joke so calm down fokes.

Crazyhorse1
03-17-2007, 01:43 AM
No way. No one will touch AA's contract.

I'm hoping we can trade AA for Bly and that JaMarcus with fall to us at #6. After that, I'd like to pick up Gaines Adams in the third and Okoye in the fourth. Maybe we can pick up Calvin Johnson after that but think we might have to settle for Branch.

jsarno
03-17-2007, 02:02 AM
I'm hoping we can trade AA for Bly and that JaMarcus with fall to us at #6. After that, I'd like to pick up Gaines Adams in the third and Okoye in the fourth. Maybe we can pick up Calvin Johnson after that but think we might have to settle for Branch.

WHAT??? Adams in the 3rd??? You mean 3rd pick overall right? Cause he's a top 10 prospect. This post makes absolutely no sense...come to think of it, why am I even bother to make a reply on a pipe dream? Shame on me.

dmek25
03-17-2007, 06:10 AM
2 players we dont need....are you serious, outside of moss/ Lioyd and randell at best is poor 2nd and 3rd receivers, antwann a great returned, but Calvin Johnson is a beast a freak of nature, and adrian peterson, is probably going to be a stud in 2 yrs, we still have Betts, and Jason Campbell will have a speedster and big target to through to, which means betts and peterson, will keep the 8 man from honest.....I LOVE PORTIS, THINK HES GREAT, but how much longer you think he will hold up, i hope forever but last year is a bad sign,........but sorr dmek25, i guess your opinion is the only one that counts
first off, I'm not trying to say my opinion is right, I'm am just stating it. and secondly, all 3 of those receivers are proven NFL players. we do not need another reciever. and if you watched the redskins last season, ladell betts is a fine BACK UP. i don't think any of us want our main ball carrier to fumble as much, especially in crucial times, as betts as shown a tendency to. and if we do what you want, who the hell is playing defense? i for one do not want the same cast as we had on the field last year. we already proved that doesn't work

JoeRedskin
03-17-2007, 11:13 AM
aa for bly could happen.

just like no one would give dockery a ludicrous contract!thats proof that aa for bly could happen.

So, an unrelated transaction in which a team needing O-Line help, paid an exhorbitant amount for one of the top 3 guards on the market in a market flush with new money, IS ABSOLUTE PROOFthat a team with a hard hitting safety that is a liability in coverage (John Lynch anyone), having just traded 2 starters and a fifth round choice for a top-flight CB, will turn around and trade that CB for a third string safety that everyone acknowledges is a liability in coverage.

Why yes, the logic of your statement is irrefutable. The sun comes up every morning PROVES that cows give milk.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum