Dirtbag59
03-07-2007, 12:27 AM
why not just bring taylor jacobs back to play te?
Because Jacobs is the perfect fusion of Jello and paper.
Because Jacobs is the perfect fusion of Jello and paper.
Why are the Skins TE shopping??Dirtbag59 03-07-2007, 12:27 AM why not just bring taylor jacobs back to play te? Because Jacobs is the perfect fusion of Jello and paper. Redskins8588 03-07-2007, 01:26 AM I know he's older, but since we're shopping and names are being bandied abot, what about Jermaine Wiggins? He's a very good blocker, huge size, and an excellent receiver in his own right. And the price would be right, too. Since he got cut last week i haven't heard his name yet visiting anyone. ~Bang Wiggins is nothing more than a Cooley clone. Wiggins is only 10lbs heavier than Cooley. I agree with Schneed10 Good post. We don't need another Cooley clone, we need a road-grader for power-running downs. Football is a situational game. There are situations when having two pass catching TEs does you very little good. You need a TE on the roster that can line up and just mash an LB or even a DE in a run blocking situation. Our goalline offense still isn't where I'd like it to be. If you're truly smashmouth, you line up when everyone and their grandmother knows you're going to run, and you run it anyway. And if you're truly smashmouth, you make the yardage. We need a bulldozer at TE. I have said this before and got ridiculed... djnemo65 03-07-2007, 06:31 AM Thrash is a big guy, knows the game, is good and thinks (uses his head)... jocobs???... not going there. Man hess, I thought you were joking and I was just going along. You were serious? SmootSmack 03-07-2007, 09:06 AM If Cooley goes down, who would step in? Sellers could shift out to TE, but who would be the lead blocker? I don't trust Yoder to be the #1 TE or White to be the #1 FB. two words: LaVar Arrington ;) dblanch66 03-07-2007, 12:37 PM Depth.....we have none at TE. If Cooley went down we would be hurt bad. That being said I can see then looking aroud. People its not going to happen fast on the TE or Guard spots. We are going to look around as the free agent market slows down and the money drys up. Then we will pick up the players we need and this is were great FO win super Bowls! Yep. Depth is kinda important in the NFL. "Why are we TE shopping"....jeeesh. hesscl34 03-07-2007, 12:42 PM Yep. Depth is kinda important in the NFL. "Why are we TE shopping"....jeeesh. Then bring in a rookie, not a named TE. We don't need that. It only causes upset among the veteran players..... JEEEEEEEEESH! MTK 03-07-2007, 12:50 PM They key word here is depth. If they were shopping for a starter then we could say what the F is going on. But otherwise is this really worth getting upset over? GhettoDogAllStars 03-07-2007, 01:27 PM I didn't read the entire thread, so excuse me if this was said before... Another option would be to look at FB. If we could get a good run blocking FB, either in FA or via the draft, then we could move Sellers to TE. It's just a thought considering the lack of quality blocking TEs. hesscl34 03-07-2007, 01:33 PM They key word here is depth. If they were shopping for a starter then we could say what the F is going on. But otherwise is this really worth getting upset over? No one is upset.. just talking about the shopping... ArtMonkDrillz 03-07-2007, 01:39 PM No one is upset.. just talking about the shopping... Please, you know you love shopping. Although, I do agree that we have more pressing needs. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum