jrocx69
03-04-2007, 04:17 PM
If we pass on Alan Branch i will go insane, he will make Smoot,Springs and Rogers much better
it will benefit fletcher more than the DB's dude. gaines or jamaal would benefit the DB's more
Beemnseven
03-04-2007, 04:21 PM
Branch seems like the next Big Daddy to me.
There's alot of depth along the defensive line in this draft, I'm hoping we can trade down, get more picks, and still fill needs.
I tell you, the more I hear of people taking a dump on Alan Branch, if we were to trade down, he could still be there for us to be able to grab him and another defensive linemen or two.
Crat92
03-04-2007, 04:22 PM
Why do you think Branch will be the next Big Daddy?
He played at Michigan weighing 336lbs. Weight with this guy is a major concern. It's not like he set the world on fire this year anyway. He was okay but nothing stellar.
GiantsSuck703
03-04-2007, 04:23 PM
it will benefit fletcher more than the DB's dude. gaines or jamaal would benefit the DB's more
Branch will make the whole defense better, Branch will also help the DBs because it will keep them from having to bite on Play action all the time
GiantsSuck703
03-04-2007, 04:29 PM
He played at Michigan weighing 336lbs. Weight with this guy is a major concern. It's not like he set the world on fire this year anyway. He was okay but nothing stellar.
Just so you know, Alan Branch was DT on the Nations #1 rush defense, they allowed 43.4 rush yards per game
Beemnseven
03-04-2007, 04:31 PM
Branch will make the whole defense better, Branch will also help the DBs because it will keep them from having to bite on Play action all the time
As you can tell from my sig, I'm with you -- but man, this guy's stock is dropping big time.
In addition to his alleged weight problem, he's been described as lazy and takes several plays off. His stats aren't all that impressive either. Now, that could be because he gathers so much attention and double teams that other guys wind up making the tackle. I'd be interested to know what other D-tackles are expected to go in the first round, but I haven't heard of any. Branch is practically the only player at his position that you hear about good or bad.
I used to be a 100% draft Alan Branch guy -- but the more negative things I hear about him, I have to admit that percentage has dropped to about 94-96%.
If we could trade down and be able to get the next best defensive tackle, and a defensive end, that would be ideal.
Crat92
03-04-2007, 04:31 PM
Just so you know, Alan Branch was DT on the Nations #1 rush defense, they allowed 43.4 rush yards per game
And your point is..................?
jrocx69
03-04-2007, 04:32 PM
Arent LB's and FS/SS 's a little more notorious for "biting" PA than CB's?? just my opinion i could be wrong
freddyg12
03-04-2007, 04:36 PM
Branch seems like the next Big Daddy to me.
There's alot of depth along the defensive line in this draft, I'm hoping we can trade down, get more picks, and still fill needs.
I'm liking the sound of Adam Carriker more as far as the likelihood of being a solid nfl starter. Adams & Anderson are rated high based on their pass rush ability, but it seems a lot of those highly rated pass rush prospects don't pan out.
Certainly aren't many reggie white type guys lately, lots of de's seem smaller the last few years.
Carriker might sill be there in the early to mid teens.
Beemnseven
03-04-2007, 04:40 PM
And your point is..................?
I believe the point would be that Alan Branch contributed to the nation's #1 ranking against the run, and had something to do with allowing only 43.4 yards per game on the ground.