Jets tried to trade for Betts

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5

Rajmahal33
03-02-2007, 10:42 AM
Not only on a seasonal level, but run first teams have to use multiple backs if they want to sustain success over a long period of time. If a guy gets too many carries in a season (remember Jamal Lewis, Jamaal Anderson, or Shaun Alexander), theres a high probability that he's either going to break down or that his production will be slashed.

I'm actually going to take this a step further. I have noticed a uncannity ability for Clinton Portis to fall foward and absorb the hit of the ground on his shoulders. He also has mentioned having very sore shoulders after games. I'm pretty sure he's developed this tendency to lighten the beating his knees take and prolong his career. Seems like a great idea in theory. But is it really surprising that after the long offseason layoff, that the first time he ended up being forced to use his arms to make a forceful tackle, he suffered a shoulder seperation and torn labrum? Isn't it possible that this was the result of many years of getting his shoulder area beat to a pulp every Sunday, particularly in 2005?

Maybe that injury wasn't as much a function of luck as we all thought it was. Perhaps it could have been avoided by lightening his load of carries in that 2005 season.

So the key for 2007 is to use our great RB depth to keep Portis from consistently breaking the 20 carry mark while still allowing this team to run 30-35 times a game.


I guess the bottom line is to let somebody else gobble up Larry Johnson in fantasy drafts next season.

Very good point, Gtripp, I hadn't really thought about it but in retrospect he does hit the ground hard on his shoulders, neck or back at the first point of impact. I guess this is a good plan in the long run b/c if u had to pick one joint to have for longevity, the knees are the most critical for the running back. I think he should consult a sports equipment manufacturer about finding him some specialized pads that will cushion his shoulders a little better without adding too much weight.

#56fanatic
03-02-2007, 10:44 AM
makes you wonder what the plans are if they are listening to trade offers for betts. with portis, and Joes paranoya of having a #1 backup. Do you think they are inclined to offer Ducket some kind of deal to stay at a #2. Knowing he will get 10 to 13 carries a game and definately a lot of touches around the goal line?

that is if they were to trade Betts. I doubt they would go into the season with Rock as the only backup to portis. Sellers isn't going to be used like that, I dont think.

Duffman003
03-02-2007, 11:16 AM
Gibbs <3 Betts

BangCartoon
03-02-2007, 11:28 AM
Of course I think the Skins have to at least listen to offers for Betts, but if I were them I'd be very reluctant to trade him away unless it's an incredible offer. He proved to be very valuable last year and you just have to look at the teams in the Super Bowl this year to see how important it's become to have two capable RBs.
I totally agree. Not to mention both Portis and Betts have a bad habit of getting nicked up during a season, it's essential to have them both. I'd like to see Vilma, but not at the expense of such a potentially important player. I know everyone loves first round picks, but if we traded it for Vilma, I wouldn't mind.

~Bang

FRPLG
03-02-2007, 11:34 AM
I totally agree. Not to mention both Portis and Betts have a bad habit of getting nicked up during a season, it's essential to have them both. I'd like to see Vilma, but not at the expense of such a potentially important player. I know everyone loves first round picks, but if we traded it for Vilma, I wouldn't mind.

~Bang

Yeah a Vilma for the 1st would be solid. We need line help but the risk of a bust DLineman is far outweighed by the sure thing of a very good LB. I doubt the Jets would make that trade though.

Daseal
03-02-2007, 11:41 AM
I'd try to deal Betts HARD right now. I'd think about an early 2nd, and take a 1st in no time. His value will never be so high. He's a mediocre blocker, and has fumbling issues. Use Portis as our bellcow and use Rock, Duckett, Sellers, whomever to take 10-15 carries a game. I'd love to see more from Rock.

BangCartoon
03-02-2007, 11:42 AM
Yeah a Vilma for the 1st would be solid. We need line help but the risk of a bust DLineman is far outweighed by the sure thing of a very good LB. I doubt the Jets would make that trade though.


Yeah, I doubt they would either. No more Terry Bradway up there to kick around! As you said, any draft pick is a potential bust.. in my mind using the pick on a young proven guy like Vilma where you know what you're getting is not a bad move. He's only 25 yrs old. (well, 26 next month.)
That is one thing that I have not minded about our heavy handed approach to free agency lately, going after younger players.

~Bang

Redskin Rich
03-02-2007, 12:19 PM
The rumors I have heard was Portis was on the block and that Betts was going to be the number 1.... he is more of a Gibbs style running... more North and South than Portis.

SmootSmack
03-02-2007, 12:30 PM
The rumors I have heard was Portis was on the block and that Betts was going to be the number 1.... he is more of a Gibbs style running... more North and South than Portis.

This is like the second time you've said this this week isn't it?

EXoffender
03-02-2007, 12:31 PM
I'd try to deal Betts HARD right now. I'd think about an early 2nd, and take a 1st in no time. His value will never be so high. He's a mediocre blocker, and has fumbling issues. Use Portis as our bellcow and use Rock, Duckett, Sellers, whomever to take 10-15 carries a game. I'd love to see more from Rock.I'm with you (sans Betts blocking and fumbling issues). Let's rob another team for picks and players. It's done to us all the time. Let's turn the tables for once! McCareins and our original 2nd rounder, 37th overall for Betts.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum