Brunell and Redskins Reportedly Close to Restructured Deal

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

SmootSmack
02-27-2007, 12:17 AM
"In such a deal, Brunell, 36, likely would end up with a considerably lower cap figure, with a portion of his salary converted into a bonus, and a base salary closer to $1 million. Although he would make much less than $5.2 million, he would have job security for next season and some guaranteed money from the new bonus. Base salaries are not guaranteed in the NFL, and each team must fit under the $109 million salary cap."

washingtonpost.com (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/26/AR2007022601580.html)

staylor825
02-27-2007, 01:21 AM
Springs I hope your next

bigSkinsfan61
02-27-2007, 02:09 AM
gee im glad he agreed to restructure.... that'll help a little with our cap problem maybe well get clements and fletcher afterall....id still like the idea about the vilma for betts trade if there is any truth to it

That Guy
02-27-2007, 02:14 AM
but more importantly, we tendered punter derrick frost, so his services will once again be available for our beloved franchise ;).

That Guy
02-27-2007, 02:16 AM
this should save a little over 3mill this year, but that's still a ways off from having enough for dockery/fletcher/clements/te?/de? it says they're looking for.

might be able to get fletcher, dockery, an either bly or smoot though with a very cheap TE (or vet min OG/OT to convert).

offiss
02-27-2007, 04:57 AM
"In such a deal, Brunell, 36, likely would end up with a considerably lower cap figure, with a portion of his salary converted into a bonus, and a base salary closer to $1 million. Although he would make much less than $5.2 million, he would have job security for next season and some guaranteed money from the new bonus. Base salaries are not guaranteed in the NFL, and each team must fit under the $109 million salary cap."

washingtonpost.com - nation, world, technology and Washington area news and headlines (http://washingtonpost.com)

Tafkas you might want to hang on to this post it will save a lot of time typing every off season for the next 4 or 5 years.

And you thought luggage stay's with you for life, this guy is like an uninvited relative that never leaves.

Redskins8588
02-27-2007, 05:02 AM
Tafkas you might want to hang on to this post it will save a lot of time typing every off season for the next 4 or 5 years.

And you thought luggage stay's with you for life, this guy is like an uninvited relative that never leaves.

Why are you always so hard on Brunell?

dmek25
02-27-2007, 06:30 AM
I'm not big on brunell, but think he would be a more then adequate backup

Redskins8588
02-27-2007, 06:53 AM
I'm not big on brunell, but think he would be a more then adequate backup

Thats fine but why be hard on Brunell about his contract? Its not his fault that the FO threw the bank at him. He did what any other QB in his situation would have done he took the $$. Fine be hard on him about his diminished QB skills and what not but you shouldnt hate on him because he went for the $$...

CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR
02-27-2007, 06:56 AM
thank godness i can sleep better knowing that gibbs will have his danny weurfel on his team.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum