SmootSmack
02-25-2007, 11:38 PM
Overall, it was-to be blunt-a disappointing season for the Redskins in 2006. Some guys in particular stood out though with their disappointing performance on the field.
Which of these four guys (Archuleta, Lloyd, Marshal, Rogers) is most likely to bounce back in 2007 with a strong season for the Redskins?
Vote or Earthquake will start a thread about starting threads that Daseal will piss on as Sportscurmudgeon asks you to please consider the economic ramifications of Chief Chucking My Spear's latest rant bemoaning Schneed10's poll of optimism.
BigSKINBauer
02-25-2007, 11:48 PM
Rogers is the youngest one on the list and is going to mature and come into his own.
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace
02-25-2007, 11:58 PM
I agree with Rogers, but dang...Archuletta and Lloyd really have nowhere to go but up
SkinsLove24/7
02-26-2007, 12:01 AM
The Secondary needs rogers to come into his own and be able to shut down those #1 WR's.
724Skinsfan
02-26-2007, 12:04 AM
I picked Rogers. What did he have, 6 or 7 dropped INT's this year? Catch those balls and he'll be a Pro Bowler.
I think Lloyd has the greatest potential if he can get his act together. Too bad for him his success depends on the other receivers and the QB getting him th ball. Not to mention Saunders offense doesn't seem very stat favorable for receivers.
Hard to say what role AA and Marshall are going to play next year so speculating their bounce back is going to be hard to pinpoint.
DiehardSkin88
02-26-2007, 12:13 AM
I went with Rogers. Hopefully he is going to train with Darrel Green and Deion so he can really step his game up.
Paintrain
02-26-2007, 12:13 AM
Arch.. I find it impossible to believe he forgot to play football in one offseason. I think his confidence was shot and he was probably misused in GW system. Hopefully this year GW and AA will find ways to maximize his skills.
Daseal
02-26-2007, 12:25 AM
I'm feeling Lloyd. I don't really think Rogers had an awful season for a 2nd year player. Lloyd didn't get the ball thrown his way very often and I see that changing in '07!
That Guy
02-26-2007, 01:07 AM
don't you have to have a good season to be able to "bounce back"?
i'd guess arch. if he doesn't get burnt 4 times a game, it'll be a huge improvement.
SmootSmack
02-26-2007, 01:15 AM
don't you have to have a good season to be able to "bounce back"?
i'd guess arch. if he doesn't get burnt 4 times a game, it'll be a huge improvement.
They've all (with the possible exception of Rogers) shown they can play in the NFL.