That Guy
02-24-2007, 01:40 PM
I think head to head, pound for pound, Vilma is the better player. Plus he's a lot younger.
you're right on that, but again, its branch + fletcher + betts, or vilma + someone that's not that good (or not going to contribute big in his first year).
Rajmahal33
02-24-2007, 03:00 PM
The Vilma trade is a horrible idea for what we need. We need multiple day 1 picks to address some of our holes on defense. Keeping betts/#6 pick and signing fletcher or clements or both (who will make immediate impacts) is the better move for this team. We can then trade the #6 pick for a late 1st rounder and a 2nd/3rd rounder, which u then use to pick up D-line and secondary help. WE HAVE TALENT ON DEFENSE! We just need to build around it and fill some holes like every other playoff team in the NFL does thru the draft.
Maximizing the number of picks in draft can get us back to the playoffs next year.
Longtimefan
02-24-2007, 03:08 PM
We have too many holes on the defensive line to spend that 6th pick on a linebacker, no matter how good that linebacker is.
Plus if we traded Betts, we'd have no depth at RB. It's be Portis and my two grandmothers at the RB position.
That Vilma trade would be a horrendous idea.
I agree.....We have too many holes to fill on defense to think we can fix every position this off-season. This team needs HELP in the first line of defense more than any other position. We have virtually nothing up front, and I think we should saty at #6 and draft the best DT- DE available.
redskins5044
02-24-2007, 03:23 PM
this trade is the dumbest shit i have heard of. how we give up Betts who is a better player at his position for Vilma is. and swap first round picks if we did this trade i would so pissed out the front office. this trade is know where an even trade. maybe if we trade betts for vilma swaped first rounders and also got 2nd round pick and a 4th.
Longtimefan
02-24-2007, 04:02 PM
this trade is the dumbest shit i have heard of. how we give up Betts who is a better player at his position for Vilma is. and swap first round picks if we did this trade i would so pissed out the front office. this trade is know where an even trade. maybe if we trade betts for vilma swaped first rounders and also got 2nd round pick and a 4th.
If we don't do something to upgrade our front four, we could have Dick Butkus at MLB and it wouldn't matter. I can't begin to count the times I watched our defense shredded in the passing game, more from the lack of a pass rush than anything else. We need some muscle up front to occupy blockers in order to make any LB effective.
dall-assblows
02-24-2007, 05:43 PM
we need a poll of weather getting vilma is good or bad.
it would be interesting.
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace
02-24-2007, 05:48 PM
its not just getting him...because that would be good, its whether or not giving up an arm and a leg is worth it...and its not
RobH4413
02-24-2007, 06:22 PM
Don't do it.
Portis cannot take the entire load of the season without Betts.
That's huge. We can't afford that.
724Skinsfan
02-24-2007, 06:26 PM
Don't do it.
Portis cannot take the entire load of the season without Betts.
That's huge. We can't afford that.
Not advocating the move but I would think that they will find someone serviceable to backup Clinton. Who knows, it may be someone that doesn't fumble...