hesscl34
02-22-2007, 02:14 PM
Let's just assume that Mark Brunell is released, where do the Skins go? Everyone knows that Joe Gibbs loves veteran backups. There will be a few guys available, I'd like to bring up a few Drew Bledsoe and Joey Harrington.
Last year was a bad year for Drew, but he can still play...a little. I don't think he's as bad as he played last year, but I think he'd be a decent insurance policy.
Joey Harrington, on the other hand, had the first good year of his career last year. He wasn't great, but he's not going to be a starter (we hope). I think he'd be a very quality backup.
The main reason I'm bringing them up is because either should come really cheap and not cost the frachise however much Brunell's going to. If Mark doesn't restructure, he needs to be released and then they need to look for someone not named Todd Collins.
They won't be releasing MB!!
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
02-22-2007, 02:21 PM
I think Brunell will be the backup. I wouldn't mind only keeping 2 QBs on the roster with ARE acting as the emergency #3 QB.
sportscurmudgeon
02-22-2007, 02:22 PM
diehardskin:
If the Redskins actually drafted Chris Leak, do you think the Wash Post would have the chops to do a headline:
Skins Take A Leak In Round One
Just asking...
SmootSmack
02-22-2007, 04:04 PM
Raiders just cut Aaron Brooks. Would you guys consider him?
Raiders just cut Aaron Brooks. Would you guys consider him?
No.
Maybe we could convert him to WR though?
;)
Redskins_P
02-22-2007, 04:12 PM
No.
Maybe we could convert him to WR though?
;)
Or CB :cheeky-sm
skinsfan69
02-22-2007, 05:13 PM
Raiders just cut Aaron Brooks. Would you guys consider him?
YES!!!!!!!
He's got game experience, he had several good years in NO and he has much better skills than anyone behind JC.
Just becasue someone knows Al's system does not mean they get an automatic roster spot. That ridicules. I would bring him here in a heartbeat.
Monkeydad
02-22-2007, 05:31 PM
YES!!!!!!!
He's got game experience, he had several good years in NO and he has much better skills than anyone behind JC.
Just becasue someone knows Al's system does not mean they get an automatic roster spot. That ridicules. I would bring him here in a heartbeat.
NO!!!!!!!
He's stunk it up at every stop in his career. True, we wouldn't be starting him, but why bring in someone as a backup that has proven he's not an NFL quarterback? The point of a backup QB is not to just fill an open roster spot, it's to keep the team competitive if the starter is lost. Brooks can not do that.
Collins can't either.
Brunell can if healthy though.
Randel El as an emergency QB would be ideal. If we get down to him, we can always sign an unemployed QB...there are plenty of them. Rarely does a 3rd QB see the field anyways. This would also allow us to keep an extra DB on the roster...something we could've used last year.
GMScud
02-22-2007, 05:36 PM
Raiders just cut Aaron Brooks. Would you guys consider him?
This one is tough for me. The upside would be that Brooks is still young (31), and has played at a high level for a number of years (21+ TD passes in 4 out of his 7 seasons as a full time starter). Plus he has a similar skill set to JC - strong arm, pass first, but quick and elusive when necessary. And he'll never be cheaper than he will this offseason. You could have JC, Brooks, Collins in that order.
The downside is that Brooks has been interception prone, and just finished getting his ego shoved down his throat for a season with Oakland. There is a reason he has been cut two seasons in a row. Plus the times that Brunell plays terribly are when he wears down physically and gets knicked. If he is serving in a backup role, he'll be fresh if needed. Bringing back JC, Brunell, and Collins will give us 3 guys who are veterans of Saunders system. And Brunell is a respected leader in the locker room.
Flip a coin...