JGisLordOfTheRings
02-16-2007, 09:45 PM
Just read this on Redskins.com.
Mock Madness, Part I (http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=24856)
Mock Madness, Part I (http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=24856)
Compiled Mock Draft ResultsPages :
[1]
2
JGisLordOfTheRings 02-16-2007, 09:45 PM Just read this on Redskins.com. Mock Madness, Part I (http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=24856) GTripp0012 02-16-2007, 10:29 PM Thats the problem with Mocks--everybody and their grandma does them. Certain ones are informative, but only if they have inside information. ArtMonkDrillz 02-16-2007, 10:31 PM Just like March Madness brackets. Only a few more weeks! JGisLordOfTheRings 02-16-2007, 10:32 PM Thats the problem with Mocks--everybody and their grandma does them. Certain ones are informative, but only if they have inside information. True, but you can never tell which one REALLY has the scoop. Jesus, I read one of em and I changed my mind and thought we might take J. Anderson. LOL. No I'm pretty sure we take Branch seeing as how a lot of people kinda snub Adams even though a lot of those mocks had us getting him. Weird. GTripp0012 02-16-2007, 10:35 PM True, but you can never tell which one REALLY has the scoop. Jesus, I read one of em and I changed my mind and thought we might take J. Anderson. LOL. No I'm pretty sure we take Branch seeing as how a lot of people kinda snub Adams even though a lot of those mocks had us getting him. Weird.Well, you have Kiper who usually has the inside scoop; Florio's got his sources at PFT; and some local media outlets have info on their teams. None of these sources know anything right now, but their mocks will get more accurate as we get closer to the draft. Beemnseven 02-16-2007, 10:36 PM We've got to stop the run first. Draft Branch. He'll open things up for the other D-linemen. FRPLG 02-17-2007, 12:08 AM At this point the mocks are more about who they think we SHOULD draft more than anything else. I doubt any team has anything remotely close to read on where there going in the draft much less any experts. FRPLG 02-17-2007, 12:09 AM I don't think we can wrong with either Anderson or Branch. Branch will be a solid inside presence for years starting right away. Anderson could be a special player but will most likely need some work. To me if we have to choose between the two it is a good problem to have. Beemnseven 02-17-2007, 02:14 AM I don't think we can wrong with either Anderson or Branch. Branch will be a solid inside presence for years starting right away. Anderson could be a special player but will most likely need some work. To me if we have to choose between the two it is a good problem to have. Well, you're right in the sense that we need help at both spots. But, more fundamentally, you have to stop the run first. If you can't stuff the run, there's no need to pass. I agree we need much more pressure on the QB. But if we draft Adams or Anderson we're still going to get gashed through the line. Daseal 02-17-2007, 02:23 AM I agree we need much more pressure on the QB. But if we draft Adams or Anderson we're still going to get gashed through the line. And when you're going against the team with the fewest sacks in the NFL you don't care what the interior of that line looks like, because you have all day to throw the ball. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum