WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

I didn't know much about Branch until the other day I looked at ESPN and they had a story on Branch's workout and dude is a MONSTER !!!! Him next to Griffin should prove to be a good look for the interior D-Line. I'm also all for trading down but I think D Line is where the Skins should look this draft. If a kick ass deal comes to trade down then I say do it because you can definitely find a couple of pretty decent players later on, I understand that Branch could turn into a bust at #6 as much as Lester Washington-Jenkins could at #180 but I think that man needs to be in a Skins uni next year.

I'm sure someone is going to correct me on Washingtons later pick # but you get my point.

I'm all for London Fletcher too as long as it's not one of those record deals. I swear I hope the Giants feel like Pierce is as expendable as GW did because I'd love to have him back with the Skins. I doubt it will happen but it's cool to dream of the Skins correcting THAT mistake.

The more I hear about this the better...get fletcher and clements, draft branch...BOOM we have depth at every position except safety. If we pick up smoot, then springs can shift there...if not, then we can draft one late in the draft...heck if we get a fifth rounder out of Arch, we can use that.

The more I hear about this the better...get fletcher and clements, draft branch...BOOM we have depth at every position except safety. If we pick up smoot, then springs can shift there...if not, then we can draft one late in the draft...heck if we get a fifth rounder out of Arch, we can use that.

I wish arch could be gone but i don't think there is any way possible. We can't trade him b/c no one will accept his contract unless he restructures (highly unlikely) or we can't release him b/c of the cap hit. He'll be there and will still be the most expensive back up in league history.

I wish arch could be gone but i don't think there is any way possible. We can't trade him b/c no one will accept his contract unless he restructures (highly unlikely) or we can't release him b/c of the cap hit. He'll be there and will still be the most expensive back up in league history.


I meant if the Bears rumor was true...but yeah, I expect him to be here

the thing about archuleta he is not a bad player he just played worse this year than the rest of our defense the contract is way too much but he will be better this year he and sean taylor will be one of the most feared tandoms in the nfl

NATE CLEMENTS
CARLOS ROGERS
SEAN TAYLOR
ALAN BRANCH
LONDON FLECTHER
MARCUS WASHINGTON
ANDRE CARTER
ADAM ARCHULETA
CORNELIUS GRIFFIN
SHAWN SPRINGS

EVERY ONE OF THOSE GUYS (except rogers) has had a pro bowl season or made it to the pro bowl

now this defense will be improved in 07 greg williams will not settle for anything less than top 10 or better

I wish arch could be gone but i don't think there is any way possible. We can't trade him b/c no one will accept his contract unless he restructures (highly unlikely) or we can't release him b/c of the cap hit. He'll be there and will still be the most expensive back up in league history.

He can be released and we can absorb the hit.

Just watch.

He can be released and we can absorb the hit.

Just watch.


Too much dead cap to absorb in 08'. He will be in uniform for 07'.

My call.

Too much dead cap to absorb in 08'. He will be in uniform for 07'.

My call.


hopefully by uniform you mean concession salesman uniform

hopefully by uniform you mean concession salesman uniform


Who should replace him?

Our entire D went from 5th to 9th to 31st!!!!!!

Why is that guys??? Not AA.

of course its not all his fault...but the guy certainly didn't help be getting burned so much...he's a run stuffer, he can't cover....we're going to either have to replace him via free agency, or use a low draft pick on a guy