saden1
07-08-2004, 02:18 PM
Bills should be a bit higher but who would you move down? I vote for the EAGLES!
Who thought it would be this tough to rank running backs?
Who thought it would be this tough to rank running backs?
FOX Sports: Best RB PackagesPages :
1
[2]
saden1 07-08-2004, 02:18 PM Bills should be a bit higher but who would you move down? I vote for the EAGLES! Who thought it would be this tough to rank running backs? Big C 07-08-2004, 02:20 PM Eagles should move down. theyre running backs are overrated. Neither of their running backs are stars, they are solid. memphisskin 07-08-2004, 03:29 PM I like that we're 11, but I hope we play like top 5. I predict Betts is going to have a big impact, 7-10 tds. Carnage 07-08-2004, 03:42 PM I'm not entirely sure I agree with you regarding the Steelers. Duce Staley is certainly a solid back, but Jerome Bettis is 50% what he used to be. If he averages more than 3.3/carry I think I'd be surprised. I think he should be relegated to short yardage/goal line situations at this point in his career, a la Gerald Riggs in '91. Even if that's true, is there a better short yardage runner in the game today? SmootSmack 07-08-2004, 04:00 PM It's remarkable, though I suppose not surprising, to see teams with Emmitt Smith and Eddie George at the bottom of the rankings. Seems like only yesterday they were the league's elite Daseal 07-08-2004, 09:09 PM Maybe it's me, but these seem like the top premier backs in the league, with whatever trash backs them up =p That Guy 07-08-2004, 10:19 PM saints should be higher, iggles lower... (sorry, i like deuce:D) SkinsRock 07-12-2004, 02:44 PM I like how he puts in a good word for Betts and Morton backing up Portis (while trashing Spurrier :D ). What's with them using the spear logo? I like it, but the retro uni's are two years ago.....get up to date! |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum