Hilary Clinton to run for President

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12

MTK
01-24-2007, 03:01 PM
Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. In general I see the Dems as weak and too concerned with taking the higher ground when at times they need to be more aggressive and strong.

firstdown
01-24-2007, 03:03 PM
What I mean by fighting back is when the Republicans start slinging the mud, the dems typically try to take the 'higher road' but sometimes you've gotta sling that mud right back. Clinton was great at that. He would fight on their level.Slinging mud is all the Democrats have done for the past 6 years and I would say its quite the opposite. What kind of mud slinging have the Republican party been doing?

saden1
01-24-2007, 03:24 PM
dubya always seems to have this condescending attitude which I find hilarious considering how dumb the guy is.

I love this classic Bushism:

"There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."

What a dipshit.


YouTube - President Bush -- Fool me Once (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ux3DKxxFoM)

Redskins_P
01-24-2007, 03:53 PM
This is great...

YouTube - Daily Show sums up Bush Speeches (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJbHRfBInd8)

hesscl34
01-24-2007, 04:01 PM
hmmmm .... I wonder how the women will vote.

At first I thought she didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell, but if the women come out in force, then that could change things.

I'm a woman, and there is no shot in hell that I'll be voting for her...

MTK
01-24-2007, 04:19 PM
Hess for prez!

TheMalcolmConnection
01-24-2007, 04:23 PM
I'm a woman, and there is no shot in hell that I'll be voting for her...

Is it because she has a bigger set of nuts than her man?

hesscl34
01-24-2007, 04:38 PM
Is it because she has a bigger set of nuts than her man?

No, it's because it's all about power and glory to her... and control. It isn't about America and it's people.... and what she can do for them.

I cannot stand either Clinton and I'll pray that she is NOT the first woman president of the US. (god help us)

dmek25
01-24-2007, 05:05 PM
Please post any statement where Bush has said there was a conection between Bin Ladan and Iraq. It was not Lawenski (spelling) it was the other lady (not sure of her name) who sued him for sexual harasment which he lied and then that got the whole Lawenski thing going. Sorry this is starting to get political I could not let this go because its not correct. Bush did say there was a tie to terrorist which has been proven but not Bin Laden and 9/11 which he has never claimed.
this is a fabricated story, along with the weapons of mass destruction, that the republicans wanted the public to believe in, so that w could invade iraq. and finish something his daddy couldnt

dmek25
01-24-2007, 05:09 PM
Not to get political too much here but if you think the Dems don't sling mud you are fooling your self Matty. Both parties do it like Rembrandt.

I think that is the biggest political problem in the country. People in each party think those in the other party are horrible and do bad things when it all reality they ALL just suck. There is barely a politician in DC I'd let babysit my kid.

It has become way too competitive and 'Us versus them' to do any good for the country.
i think what matty is trying to say, to use an example, is like when the swift boat repulicans denounced john keryys wartime experience. for the most part, no one in the party said a word, they just stood by silently, and took it. here was a decorated war veteran, getting dragged thru the mud, and the democrats let it happen

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum