Thank the Heavens Marty Lasted One Year

Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5] 6

SmootSmack
01-17-2007, 06:17 PM
San Diego has decided to keep Marty by the way.

Redskinhog1963
01-17-2007, 06:23 PM
i love the skins,i have burgundy and gold blood,and i thank god that gibbs has
coached them 2 times,no matter what happens til he retires again,but if you take away his superbowl victories,and playoff wins,schottenheimer has won more games.he just has extremeley shitty postseason performances,and even worse postseason game decisions.i would have still preffered marty to have kept his job as skins coach over spurrier any day.

ncskinsfanec
01-17-2007, 08:24 PM
We also would be in the playoffs every year , not 5-11 . Marty finished 8 - 3 , with a cast of , T. Banks , R. Gardner and not much else ,,, we have C. Portis , Moss , Loyd, R El , Cooley , and Betts off the bench and we can't win freakin 6 games ?? No , Marty would not be in my top 5 choices for our coach , but he had our salary cap in better shape and won with a hell of alot less talent than we have now ?

I think Portis was hurt most of the year, was he not? And our defense was banged up all year too. We'd win more than 6 games any other year, easy. We had so many bad breaks this past season to last us ten seasons at least. I think Marty's a great coach (in the regular season anyway) but don't go with the absurd thinking that he, or anyone else for that matter, would do better job than Gibbs and the boys if they'd have less talent. Our salary cap situation would be just the same if anyone else was coaching this team.

ncskinsfanec
01-17-2007, 08:28 PM
San Diego has decided to keep Marty by the way.

Thank goodness impatient football fans and the moronic, knee jerk media aren't running the Chargers, he would have been fired Sunday night if they had it their way! San Diego has made a fine decision, and I think they may fare a whole lot better in the postseason next year, now that they have some experience under their belts.

tdSKINS1
01-17-2007, 11:44 PM
Marty was fine he was establishing something good here, spurrier was just a new fresh name on the market that dan drools over im glad that one turned out great. Damn atleast he can make it to the post season a few times and almost make the Super Bowl.

AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace
01-18-2007, 12:26 PM
I remember thinking...we're going to be in for a sweet season next year after we wen't 8-3 down the stretch with Marty. Lavar and Gardner were both playing well, as I remember, we just needed an upgrade at QB. How times have changed...he even said that was his best coaching job ever. As far as the Skins go...we're probably not going to the superbowl next year, we're probably not even going 8-8.

Redskinhog1963
01-18-2007, 03:07 PM
Marty was fine he was establishing something good here, spurrier was just a new fresh name on the market that dan drools over im glad that one turned out great. Damn atleast he can make it to the post season a few times and almost make the Super Bowl.


spurrier was a joke as redskins coach.he just did'nt want to put in the time or effort to win.he also let all his redskin qbs take major beatings because he did'nt believe in protecting the qb.
goodbye,good riddaance and bad luck to his rich underqualified ass!about the only thing his playbook was good for was wiping your ass with the individual pages!

budw38
01-18-2007, 07:08 PM
I think Portis was hurt most of the year, was he not? And our defense was banged up all year too. We'd win more than 6 games any other year, easy. We had so many bad breaks this past season to last us ten seasons at least. I think Marty's a great coach (in the regular season anyway) but don't go with the absurd thinking that he, or anyone else for that matter, would do better job than Gibbs and the boys if they'd have less talent. Our salary cap situation would be just the same if anyone else was coaching this team. Yes , Portis did miss a lot of time , but his backup averaged close to 5 yds a carry , so while CP was missed , its not like we had a bum running the ball. I agree we had injuries , but had we not traded mulitiple picks < 4 for JC > ; 3 for rocky ; 2 for brunell , two for Loyd ,;2 for Cooley , we would have had depth . As far as the cap , many teams are more than 10 million under the cap .I heard them on ESPN ,saying that Ny , Phil & dallas are all 12 million under , and they have draft picks . We are always having to renegotiate or cut players to field a team because we give everyone 2 to 5 times what other teams give out in signing bonus's. The only star other than CP to miss much time was Springs , If a team can't handle missing 1 key player for any lenght of time , that is bad personel decisions . The eagles have lost a heck of alot more than us , DM , Kearse , Bunkley and they win ? Maybe we get lucky this year with the inj's and the Def. turns around !

CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR
01-18-2007, 09:05 PM
Marty fixed our salary cap problem. That probably one of the reasons Little Danny go rid of Marty. Marty should have been coach of the year with the crappy QB's we had with George and Banks.

CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR
01-18-2007, 09:07 PM
Hey Budw38 you hit it right out of the park. We have the worst front office in football.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum