ncskinsfanec
01-07-2007, 01:27 PM
Which choke job was worse, Phil Mickelson blowing the U.S. Open with a one stroke lead on the final hole or what Tony Romo did last night? I would have to say Romo myself.
Bigger choke: Tony Romo or Phil Mickelsonncskinsfanec 01-07-2007, 01:27 PM Which choke job was worse, Phil Mickelson blowing the U.S. Open with a one stroke lead on the final hole or what Tony Romo did last night? I would have to say Romo myself. Gmanc711 01-07-2007, 01:31 PM Well being a huge fan of one, and a hater of the other one....I'll be realistic. Its Phil Mickelson in a landslide. Tony Romo choked for sure, but thats somthing that happens from time to time. Should it have? No, but it does. Mickelson on the other hand was the biggest choke job I've ever seen. If you put any proffesional golfer in that spot, they would get it done. The guy litterally looked like you're everyday beer league golfer on that final hole. The difference too, is Mickelson had chance after chance to make up for his inital mess up. Romo's was boom, messed up, over. Phil lined up and took 7 shots and they were all equally terrible. saden1 01-07-2007, 01:38 PM As far as impact goes, Phil Mickelson cheated himself out of more money...Romo cheated himself, his teammates, the Cowboys organization, and every Cowboy fan on the planet. Romo rakes it by a mile. Way to go Romo! The Huddle 01-07-2007, 01:40 PM Mickelson. If someone wants to call what Romo did a "choke" I don't have a big problem with that but in fairness, as woeful as Bledsoe was looking early on, Dallas probably isn't in the playoffs without him. Also, he did what he could last night, and he did have his team in positon to win. His "choke" was one lightning-quick moment that had come and gone almost before anyone knew what had happened. Mickelson KNEW he was choking and couldn't do anything about it. BigSKINBauer 01-07-2007, 01:43 PM Do you think it was just a random fumble, or was it caused by the pressure. Was he thinking, I got to get this down or was he just not consentrating enough? Its such an easy thing to do, that if it was due to pressure it was him as the biggest choke job. Gmanc711 01-07-2007, 01:48 PM Do you think it was just a random fumble, or was it caused by the pressure. Was he thinking, I got to get this down or was he just not consentrating enough? Its such an easy thing to do, that if it was due to pressure it was him as the biggest choke job. Well, I dont think he was concentrating to be honest. I think everyone thought it was over, and if it was either of those two, he just wasent thinking about it. My other question about last night.... Is what the hell was Terry Glenn doing on that hail mary. Did he just not see the ball or what because he had a very serious chance at catching that.........but he didnt :) hooskins 01-07-2007, 02:11 PM Phil Mickelson. Easily because he is a legend and Romo is nothing. Phil fell over a long period of time and he knew he was slipping. He was at the top of his game and was a vet. Romo is just some over hyped loser. In the end Romo is nothing, and personally I would expect something bad out of him in a big game. dmek25 01-07-2007, 02:23 PM [quote=hooskins;267974]Phil Mickelson. Easily because he is a legend and Romo is nothing. quote] this is a classic ncskinsfanec 01-07-2007, 02:31 PM [quote=hooskins;267974]Phil Mickelson. Easily because he is a legend and Romo is nothing. quote] this is a classic Phil does have three majors, so he is pretty accomplished. He'd probably have even more if it wasn't for that Woods fella. redskinsskickazz 01-07-2007, 02:32 PM theres no way mickelsons choke was worse than jean van de velde in the 1999 british open. that was painful to watch |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum