Washington wasn't considered a high priced Pro Bowl blockbuster when he was signed like AA, B. Smith or D. Sanders. He was added as a solid pickup and nothing more kind-of a "role player"...his career didn't take off till after he signed with the 'Skins (a rarity nowdays).
Washington signed a 6 year deal worth $25M and a bonus of $7M. Sorry but that's a little more than just a solid pickup or a role player. He was pretty highly regarded coming over from Indy.
Daseal
01-03-2007, 07:34 PM
Notice he says "High Priced." When we signed Washington we got him for a very reasonable price and no one expected him to play this well. He was just a regular free agent that panned out to be great. 6 year 25 mil really isn't that large of a contract for the 'skins.
Notice he says "High Priced." When we signed Washington we got him for a very reasonable price and no one expected him to play this well. He was just a regular free agent that panned out to be great. 6 year 25 mil really isn't that large of a contract for the 'skins.
It's not a role player $$ either. Two years ago that was a pretty nice sized deal for a LB. We didn't overpay for once, but it wasn't chump change either.
hurrykaine
01-03-2007, 11:38 PM
It's not a role player $$ either. Two years ago that was a pretty nice sized deal for a LB. We didn't overpay for once, but it wasn't chump change either.
Czaban's right. While I agree that we didn't sign him for a pittance, Washington certainly wasn't a high priced FA acquisition. In terms of guaranteed money, Washington got a contract of lesser value than what Pierce got from the Giants last year.
The high priced FAs being referred to by Czaban are Deion, Bruce Smith, Coles, Hall, Renaldo Wynn (sorry, had to get my shot at him), Tupa, Brunell, Carter, AA, Lloyd, etc.
jsarno
01-04-2007, 12:06 AM
Umm guys, not only did free agent Washington make the Pro Bowl, but free agent Coles did too.
jsarno
01-04-2007, 12:09 AM
Hey, even found an article that is interesting. It says "worth every penny".
Money in the bank: wide receiver Laveranues Coles raised a lot of eyebrows when he signed a $35 million free-agent contract with the Redskins in the offseasonbut so far, he has earned every penny Football Digest - Find Articles (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCL/is_5_33/ai_111265549)
jsarno
01-04-2007, 12:11 AM
"Here's a little factoid that may interest you: since Dan Snyder took over in 1999, not a single high-priced free agent he has brought in has made the Pro Bowl. (NOTE: 2005 Pro-Bowlers Portis and Moss were traded for, remember. Give something to get something.)"
Sorry Bill B., but I do agree that Washington is high priced, but even if you don't, you can't deny Coles.
wilsowilso
01-04-2007, 12:19 AM
Umm guys, not only did free agent Washington make the Pro Bowl, but free agent Coles did too.
Coles wasn't a free agent.
squrrelco3
01-04-2007, 12:21 AM
I feel like i take up for Czaban alot, b/c usually he sais what i think (for the most part). I am a fan and I've been usually disappointed for the better part of 15 years only to renew hope every offseason. There are worse owners out there and I've got to believe that Snyder wants to win badly enough that he'll do anything, even change a little.
As tough as I am on Danny boy, I have to agree, I really think he wants to build a winner in the tradition of the 80's teams he grew up watching. Unfortunately someone has gotten it into his head that you can build a winner by going out and pulling your scouting reports straight out of Street and Smith's Fanatasy Football Guide. if there is a splash to be made, he'll be the first one to attempt the cannonball.
SmootSmack
01-04-2007, 12:22 AM
Coles wasn't a free agent.
Restricted FA wasn't he?
As for Czabe, what's this about their my team when they win but not when they lose? If they're your team, they're your team win or lose.