A Tale of Two Teams...

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8

BeastsoftheNFCeast
12-13-2006, 01:38 AM
With respect to the cap, dude, with respect to the cap. As I've said in countless other posts, there was NO REASON to expect we would regress from last year's showing, and in fact, if the defense had held steady we probably would have easily made the playoffs in this year's weak NFC field.

It's easy to freak out and scream about stupid decisions in hindsight, but honestly, who was fuming mad this summer when we made these FA deals? We were all smug as hell, knowing that The Danny didn't mind spending the cash, and his cap wizards would find a way to make it work.

I seriously don't recall too many people calling for Grilliamss, Gibbs, or Snyder's heads because of those moves.

We didnt call them out for two reasons, 1, we don't break down the tapes over and over to see who is good to what degree, when people are signed to a 30 mil contract, you naturally assume they are a stud and fit the stystem well 2. We got caught up in the hype because of the huge contracts, this season was actually very predicable if you broke down who we played last year vs who we played this year, our lack of depth, the holes in our defense due to releases, the role that each player would play (Rogers, Arch, Taylor, were all supposed to be physical hitters, none of them were supposed to be quality covers, and springs's injuries were predicable plus the fact that he is gettting older and slower, and we had no depth at the secondary), Warrick Holdman starting, Brunell still being our QB, We had alot of key players on the downfall of their careers (Daniels, Wynn, Springs, Washington, Griffin, Saleve'a, Wright, Prioleau, Wright, Fauria, Jansen, Hall, Patten) (I'm not saying they're all bad, they're just not going to get any better, they are all in their 30s), We are mainly a run team but we signed two huge contracts to recievers when we have no good QB to get it to them (we had to have 8 men blocking almost every play last year just to have Brunell have enough time to see the open man, and when there was two he generally didnt see the open one, so how is he going to see who is open with less time) and we already had our go to guy at reciever, and Al Saunders's system supposively takes 3 years to pick up. There were signs

irish
12-13-2006, 09:56 AM
It was bad enough that the redskins were signing washed up free agents to huge contracts prior to Gibbs, now under Gibbs they sign free agents that dont seem to pan out and they give away draft picks in the process. The team is taking a double hit.

Gibbs is not a personnel guy and his moves are proving disasterous. This team needs a GM now.

MTK
12-13-2006, 10:19 AM
We've still had far more hits than misses regarding free agency.

Beemnseven
12-13-2006, 10:33 AM
We've still had far more hits than misses regarding free agency.

2002 record: 7-9
2003 record: 5-11
2004 record: 6-10
2005 record: 10-6 (the year we DIDN'T make a big free agent splash)
2006 record: 7-9 at best

Yep. Sounds like solid personnel to me!

MTK
12-13-2006, 10:37 AM
2002 record: 7-9
2003 record: 5-11
2004 record: 6-10
2005 record: 10-6 (the year we DIDN'T make a big free agent splash)
2006 record: 7-9 at best

Yep. Sounds like solid personnel to me!

I'm talking about since Gibbs came back.

The players we aquired in 2004 were the foundation of the playoff run in '05.

SmootSmack
12-13-2006, 10:38 AM
Gibbs is not a personnel guy and his moves are proving disasterous. This team needs a GM now.

I really think the issue is more with scouting than whether or not we have someone who is a "general manager"

FRPLG
12-13-2006, 10:44 AM
I really think the issue is more with scouting than whether or not we have someone who is a "general manager"

I know it is en vogue to bash the Skins but I have heard several times that the Skins employ one of the worst scouting offices in the league. I don't get it. Why? A guy like Chrid Landry who is the scout for FSR basically said they are the worst in the league.

irish
12-13-2006, 10:48 AM
I'm talking about since Gibbs came back.

The players we aquired in 2004 were the foundation of the playoff run in '05.

Like I said in an earlier post, Gibbs making personell decisions has been a huge disaster because we are making bad free agent signings and giving away draft picks too. This team needs a GM so Gibbs can go back to doing what he does best, coaching.

Citizens for 81
12-13-2006, 10:52 AM
Like I said in an earlier post, Gibbs making personell decisions has been a huge disaster...

Huge exaggeration.

MTK
12-13-2006, 10:53 AM
Schneed has had some nice posts in the past outlining the hits vs. misses regarding personnel moves the team has made under Gibbs. Perhaps he can release his updated version? Hint, hint. ;)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum