GiantsSuck703
12-10-2006, 08:19 PM
Nope.
Especially when Portis has never done for us what Betts just did.
Wow, Ladell betts rushed for 171 yards and we lost, tell me exactly what he did. Pretty much everytime Clinton runs for 100 yards we win, and dont forget he almost single handidly ran us into the playoffs last year
skinsfan69
12-10-2006, 08:22 PM
Nope.
Especially when Portis has never done for us what Betts just did.
Typical knee jerk reactions. No one loves Betts more than I do. We can win with him as our starting RB. And if someone offers a boatload of draft picks I would trade CP. But how can you compare Betts to CP after three games?
jsarno
12-10-2006, 08:23 PM
Wow, Ladell betts rushed for 171 yards and we lost, tell me exactly what he did. Pretty much everytime Clinton runs for 100 yards we win, and dont forget he almost single handidly ran us into the playoffs last year
What kind of comment is that? You can't win without and entire team! We of all teams should know that. You especially can't win without a defense. Portis could run for 250 yards and lose because this defense of ours sucks.
ps. take Betts out of the equasion today and we would have lost big. He was by far our MVP today.
skinsguy
12-10-2006, 08:24 PM
Hey. We need them both! Both compliment each other quite nicely. I don't believe we need to get rid of anyone.
jsarno
12-10-2006, 08:25 PM
Typical knee jerk reactions. No one loves Betts more than I do. We can win with him as our starting RB. And if someone offers a boatload of draft picks I would trade CP. But how can you compare Betts to CP after three games?
It's fun :D
Besides, we've pretty much talked about everything there is to talk about over these past 14 weeks, why not something new?
jsarno
12-10-2006, 08:26 PM
Hey. We need them both! Both compliment each other quite nicely. I don't believe we need to get rid of anyone.
I agree. Isn't it nice to have two competant running backs? A lot of teams wish they had what we have. As a combo tandem, we might just have the best in all of football.
dmek25
12-10-2006, 08:29 PM
Nope.
Especially when Portis has never done for us what Betts just did.
its all about wins and losses. lets talk about those numbers when betts starts, as compared to when clinton starts. its not even close
jdlea
12-10-2006, 08:34 PM
We've actually talked about this about 1 million times. However, I'll get into this thread...
Portis is a harder runner. Portis wasn't getting the holes that Betts is now getting. Yes, Betts is looking better than Portis did, however, Portis wasn't 100% and, like I said, he didn't get the same O Line play. Up until this season, Clinton has been far more durable. Betts is a guy who can has a history of injuries. He hasn't had much of a shot to carry the load because he hasn't been reliable very often. Also, how many tds did he score? None. How many does he have this year? 2. Portis has had way more than that this year. I don't wanna hear about TJ being a goal line back because he wasn't when Clinton was healthy. Clinton was the goal line back.
I'm so sick of talking about this.
jsarno
12-10-2006, 08:35 PM
its all about wins and losses. lets talk about those numbers when betts starts, as compared to when clinton starts. its not even close
Again, T-E-A-M.
This isn't tennis or golf.
ps- Portis 06 3-6, Betts 1-2. Even. (see how dumb that argument is now?)