dmek25
12-10-2006, 05:34 PM
there was a reason that the skins brought him here. i say give him at least one more year to see if we can utilize him the right way
Adam Archulettadmek25 12-10-2006, 05:34 PM there was a reason that the skins brought him here. i say give him at least one more year to see if we can utilize him the right way diehardskin2982 12-10-2006, 05:44 PM i think he is a victum of the secondary not meeting together Citizens for 81 12-10-2006, 05:48 PM Archuletta has only been effective as a safety in the NFL when he's the 8th man in the box. He's not the right match with Taylor. The secondary and Taylor play better when the opposite safety is more of a coverage guy. wilsowilso 12-10-2006, 05:53 PM There is no doubt in my mind that they are trying to make him so miserable that he begs to buy out of his contract just like they did with Lavar. It's not a bad strategy in the cap era when you don't have that many other options. He already got the nice signing bonus and he probably hates it here so he will try anything to get away. jdlea 12-10-2006, 05:54 PM Archuletta has only been effective as a safety in the NFL when he's the 8th man in the box. He's not the right match with Taylor. The secondary and Taylor play better when the opposite safety is more of a coverage guy. That's what I was saying when the Skins signed him. A lot of us on this site hate on Roy Williams. I said, when we signed him, that the Skins just gave huge money to a worse version of Roy Williams. He's only ever been marginally better than Matt Bowen. The Skins should have just hung on to him instead of signing Archuletta...or Clark...hmmmmm, what a novel thought. jsarno 12-10-2006, 07:36 PM I don't think he's that bad of a player I agree. I feel we are all down on Arch because he hasn't fit our mold and we've asked him to do waaaay too much in pass coverage. Adam has NEVER been a great pass defender, he's a run stopper. He'd be great in our system if we actually had CB's and a safty that liked to pass protect as well. Taylor and Arch together was not a good idea. Ronnie Lott was one of the best hitters in all the NFL, but he played pass defense. Both our safties don't do both. I actually like the idea of moving him to LB. (someone brought that up) He loves to hit the hole and knock people senseless. He has good speed (not great) and his size is 6'0" 223 lbs, Zach Thomas is 5'11" 228. Not a big difference. With our HORRIBLE lb's (minus Washington) we could use him!!! Bill B 12-10-2006, 08:39 PM There is no doubt in my mind that they are trying to make him so miserable that he begs to buy out of his contract just like they did with Lavar. It's not a bad strategy in the cap era when you don't have that many other options. He already got the nice signing bonus and he probably hates it here so he will try anything to get away. Actually I heard on sports talk 980 that the NFL put in new restrictions after the Lavar fiasco that does not allow players to buy out of there contracts anymore/return money to the team. Since this new rule teams have to be more than careful about handing out huge sontracts/bonuses because of this. B.F. SKINner 12-11-2006, 10:12 AM I think we should give him another shot back there. He has to be better than Vernon Fox and I'd like to see him in now, after the safeties' strategy appears to have been altered, i.e. not being as aggressive. freddyg12 12-11-2006, 01:09 PM Actually I heard on sports talk 980 that the NFL put in new restrictions after the Lavar fiasco that does not allow players to buy out of there contracts anymore/return money to the team. Since this new rule teams have to be more than careful about handing out huge sontracts/bonuses because of this. Yeah, the nflpa got that put into the new cba I believe. It guarantees "guaranteed" money as much as possible. Maybe AA will retire & then un-retire, we wouldn't have to pay him all of his salary, but I'm sure some of it would still be dead cap $. If the Lavar strategy is being used, I think it's really poor mgmt. Players talk to other players & they do have a union. It's not good for morale. In Lavar's case it seemed there was a lot he & his agents brought on himself, we haven't heard anything from AA (unless he's the mole in the Friend article) to indicate that he's a problem other than sucking in coverage. Ditto the Coles debacle. It can't be good for player-mgmt. relations to have threats looming over your player's heads! MTK 12-11-2006, 01:12 PM I don't think there's going to be any fancy workings to get AA off the team. I think they'll just cut him. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum